Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: [SEAOC] Epoxy-Coated Rebar vs. Silica-Flume Concrete

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
        Your question in regards to Silica Fume vs epoxy coated rebar 
        depends on several factors (nothing is ever easy?!).  Silica 
        Fume is a very fine pozzolan, about 100 times smaller than 
        cement.  It produces a very dense and impermeable concrete.  
        This helps in preventing the ingress of chlorides which will 
        corrode the rebar and it also helps reduce the effects of 
        sulfates which attacks the concrete itself.  Beware that Silica 
        Fume reduces the available bleed water so special precautions 
        must be taken during curing.
        
        Epoxy coated rebar, IF DONE CORRECTLY, will prevent the rebar 
        from chloride corrosion.  However, there is a lot of debate on 
        how good is the average installation.  If your project is in the 
        U.S. (preferably in a large city) then the expertise on 
        fabrication and installation probably exists.  If your project 
        is overseas then this might not be a good idea.  Note that epoxy 
        coated rebar will do nothing for the sulfate attack so you will 
        probably want to use type II or V cement.
        
        Thomas Hunt, S.E.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: [SEAOC] Epoxy-Coated Rebar vs. Silica-Flume Concrete
Author:  seaoc::(SEAOCAA) at ~FABRIK
Date:    3/2/96 11:22 AM


From: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Date: Sat, Mar 2, 1996 11:22 AM
Subject: [SEAOC] Epoxy-Coated Rebar vs. Silica-Flume Concrete
To: seaoc
I would like opinions as to which of the above would be more
cost-effective in a harsh (i.e. marine) environment.

Thanks.

--
***********************************************
*      William L. Polhemus, Jr., P.E.         *
***********************************************
*       The Ultimate in pc.net.surfing:       *
*       - OS/2 Warp V. 3.0                    *
*       - Souper V. 1.14 for OS/2             *
*       - YARN Beta V. 0.88 for OS/2          *
***********************************************
* "For my soul delighteth in the song of the  *
*  heart; yea, the song of the righteous is a *
*  prayer unto me, and it shall be answered   *
*  with a blessing upon their heads."         *
*  - Doctrine and Covenants 25:12             *
***********************************************
...
****** ******* *******
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers Association of Californi
a
*   (SEAOC) email server. To subscribe (no fee) to the list, send email to
*   seaoc-request(--nospam--at)seaoc.org and in the body of the message type subscribe.
*   To Unsubscribe, send email to seaoc-request(--nospam--at)seaoc.org and in the body of the

*   message type Unsubscribe. You can type anything you like in the subject fiel
d.
*   For questions, send email to seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org.
*   Make sure you visit our web site at:
*   http://www.seaoc.org/seaoc
* ***** ******* *******
--------
Received: from lalug.org by portia.fabrik.com
        with SMTP (AlisaMail V05.1-000a)
        id SINN.758449(--nospam--at)portia.fabrik.com ; Sat, 2 Mar 1996 13:26:27 -0800
Received: from arcana.org (arcana.org [198.186.216.151]) by lalug.org (8.6.12/8.
6.9) with ESMTP id LAA07492 for <seaoc-outgoing(--nospam--at)lalug.org>; Sat, 2 Mar 1996 11:4
0:02 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by arcana.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id LAA31623 fo
r seaoc-outgoing; Sat, 2 Mar 1996 11:37:49 -0800
Received: from power.net (touchstone.power.net [198.186.216.131]) by arcana.org
(8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA31619 for <seaoc(--nospam--at)arcana.power.net>; Sat, 2 Mar 1
996 11:37:47 -0800
Received: from uuneo.neosoft.com by power.net with smtp
        (Smail3.1.29.1 #2) id m0tsx7B-000xIqC; Sat, 2 Mar 96 11:37 PST
Received: from sam.neosoft.com (root(--nospam--at)sam.NeoSoft.COM [198.64.6.71]) by uuneo.neo
soft.com (8.7.4/8.7.4) with ESMTP id NAA05284 for <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>; Sat, 2 Mar
1996 13:37:12 -0600 (CST)
Received: from billp.neosoft.com (sam-ppp-l4.NeoSoft.COM [206.109.8.234]) by sam
.neosoft.com (8.7.4/8.7.4) with SMTP id NAA04158 for <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>; Sat, 2 M
ar 1996 13:37:10 -0600 (CST)
From: billp(--nospam--at)neosoft.com (Bill Polhemus)
Newsgroups: SEAOC.Mailing.List
To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Subject: [SEAOC] Epoxy-Coated Rebar vs. Silica-Flume Concrete
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 13:22:16 -0600
Organization: Chez Polhemus-Rivas, Katy, Texas
Message-ID: <o/JOxMvzoUBT089yn(--nospam--at)neosoft.com>
Lines: 20
Sender: owner-seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
--------
...