Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: [SEAOC] Concrete Dilema
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
- Subject: Re: [SEAOC] Concrete Dilema
- From: CarlS95(--nospam--at)aol.com
- Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 02:58:47 -0400
In a message dated 96-04-12 22:23:40 EDT, you write: > am studying to take the PE exam on the 19th, and I have run into a >snag on determining where the neutral axis is in a RC beam. The >method that I have used in the past is to simply use the expression: > >a=As*fy/.85*f'c*b and a=B1*c > >However, in flipping through my concrete book and Lindburg's PE >review manual I found another method which uses a factor multiplied >with the depth, or: > >c=k*d where k=sqrt(2*p*n+(p*n)^2)-p*n > >p= the steel ratio (since rho is not part of my keyboard) >n= the modular ratio of E (steel)/ E (conc.) > >I know that one expression is based on Ultimate Strength and the >other is based on Working Stress, but since they both assume a >cracked section shouldn't they give similar values? The neutral axis is not a fixed location. As the load on a beam increases, the theoretical neutral axis moves toward the compression face. For small loads, the section is uncracked: the theoretical neutral axis is right in the middle of the beam. For working level loads, the section is cracked: the neutral axis moves so that the strain in the compression block balances the strain in the steel. The stresses and strains are assumed to be linear from the neutral axis. Finally, for ultimate loads, the steel and/or concrete go plastic. The stresses and strains are no longer linear from the neutral axis, which is why the two formulas give different values. This is pretty apparent when you look at the assumed stress diagrams for the two methods. The first formula is what is most commonly used in concrete these days. The second formula is common for masonry, although they are switching to ultimate strength methods as quick as they can. I'm itching to draw a sketch, but it doesn't seem to work very well in E-Mail. All I can draw are smilies : - ) and frownies : - ( . Sorry you can't get a perfect answer: Both formulas are correct. If the question comes up in the exam, read what is being asked for and if you are hooked up to the Internet with your laptop, just pop on over to the SEAOC Mail Server. (Just kidding.) Good luck. Carl S. ...
- Prev by Subject: Re: [SEAOC] Concrete Dilema
- Next by Subject: Re: [SEAOC] Concrete Dilema
- Previous by thread: Re: [SEAOC] Concrete Dilema
- Next by thread: Re: [SEAOC] Concrete Dilema
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]