Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
[SEAOC] LRFD Vs. ASD?[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
- Subject: [SEAOC] LRFD Vs. ASD?
- From: "Drake, Rick" <rick.drake(--nospam--at)fluordaniel.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 13:39:00 -0800
This LRFD or ASD Design thread was initiated by Bruce Bates with: "Question for anyone who's interested: Are you using ASD or LRFD (or something else) for steel design, and why?" The responses since then indicate that there is little use of the LRFD method on the West Coast. A variety of reasons are given, but most employers seem to expect their new employees to work in ASD. This leads to my question as the Instructor of the undergraduate Structural Steel Design Courses at Cal State Fullerton: "Should the West Coast Universities be teaching ASD because the present employers are using it, or should they be teaching LRFD because future employers might be using it?" Within the curriculum it is not practical to teach both ASD and LRFD. At Cal State Fullerton, we presently teach ASD in our semester undergraduate courses. The last 2 lectures are devoted to the concepts of LRFD design. Which methods do the other West Coach schools teach? Rick Drake, SE rick.drake(--nospam--at)fluordaniel.com ...
- Prev by Subject: [SEAOC] LRFD vs ASD, midwest perspective
- Next by Subject: [SEAOC] Mail failure
- Previous by thread: [SEAOC] Re: Pushover analysis
- Next by thread: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] LRFD Vs. ASD?