Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
[SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] [SEAOC] Seismic Evaluation of Residential Buildings[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)power.net
- Subject: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] [SEAOC] Seismic Evaluation of Residential Buildings
- From: EQretroDR(--nospam--at)aol.com
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 19:30:08 -0400
In a message dated 96-06-03 23:11:14 EDT, you write: >make a hazard assessment and seismic retrofit recommendations, however >is any information is commonly provided on if this is an economically >attractive decision to make? I think the economics of it have to be included if the service is to be worthwhile. The degree of retrofit is usually driven by the cost of the improved situation (or local legislation). Most obvious case... full upgrade beyond the standards of the current codes for new construction... This option is rarely taken because of the cost versus the reduced risk. But an owner must make that decision based on the economics of it. As engineers, we want to reduce the risk of loss of life and property as a result of the forces a building is subjected to but I do not believe that we must take a stand that all it's all or nothing... A complete service includes the options and its costs. It's like an old engineering economics problem I did...the recommendation had to be to pay the flood insurance premium and rebuild after the floods rather than raise the building site or control the regular flooding... It goes against the grain of engineering (which is to anticipate the problems and solve them) but it was the practical and correct solution. The most attractive decision is usually one that has the highest rate of return for the cost. Foundation bolting is a prime example... While it does not address many of the potential problems, it is probably provides the highest increase in safety for the least amount of money... Next in line is probably soft story conditions.. As with any loose thread, you could pull and unravel the entire building from a lateral standpoint, but somewhere you have to determine that you are going to stop at a given point... This point is usually cost driven. EQretroDR(--nospam--at)aol.com Steve Privett CE ...
- Prev by Subject: [SEAOC] RE: [SEAOC] [SEAOC] Seismic Evaluation of Residential Buildings
- Next by Subject: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Aftershocks vs. Main Shock
- Previous by thread: [SEAOC] RE: [SEAOC] [SEAOC] Seismic Evaluation of Residential Buildings
- Next by thread: [SEAOC] [SEAOC]