Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

[SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] ASD vs. LRFD Survey Summary

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
>fine. The most common reason given for switching to LRFD is that it results
>in slimmer, more efficient designs.

I'd be real curious about which sorts of structures show the greatest
efficiencies and whether there's a correlation between the degree to which
lateral loading plays a part in the efficiencies. Was any comparison done
to determine where the efficiencies come in? (Column, girder, connection
economies? High rise vs small structures?) Are you implying simply lower
allowable design margins based on more analysis or is there something
inherently more reliable about LRFD that provides a better estimate of the

Christopher Wright P.E.    |"They couldn't hit an elephant from
chrisw(--nospam--at)        | this dist--"   (last words of Gen.
Voice phone (612)933-6182  | John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864)