Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

[SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] ASD vs. LRFD Survey Summary

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
At 10:30 AM 6/12/96 -0700, Julie Mark Cohen wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Jun 1996, David Owens wrote:
>> At 09:16 AM 6/12/96 -0600, Christopher Wright wrote:
>> >>fine. The most common reason given for switching to LRFD is that it results
>> >>in slimmer, more efficient designs.
>> >
>> As in Tacoma Narrows, perhaps?
>The Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse was a design and systems-oriented 
>problem.  Torsion can be limited somewhat by increasing member sizes, 
>but can by understanding overall geometry and behavioral response.

Dear Julie Mark-

What do you mean-exactly-by a systems-oriented problem? They had to add
trusses-and did it to most of the bridges in America.