Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
[SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Aftershocks vs. Main Shock[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)power.net
- Subject: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Aftershocks vs. Main Shock
- From: CarlS95(--nospam--at)aol.com
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 00:49:50 -0400
In a message dated 96-06-18 05:23:20 EDT, you write: >I am posting this message on the SEAOC List Server because I did not get any >responses by posting on the appropriate Newsgroups related to earthquakes. >"Does anyone know of any references of researchers who have done a >statistical >study of the number of the earthquake sequences where the aftershock or >aftershocks are larger than the main shock? I realize that if the aftershock >or >aftershocks are larger than the main shock, then the main shock is a >foreshock. >Please reply to fmcclure(--nospam--at)ccnet.com Thank you." >Frank McClure fmcclure(--nospam--at)ccnet.com I guess the question is: "How often is the main shock preceeded by a foreshock series?" I can't answer your question, but I was browsing about five or six months ago through newsgroups and found one called "ca.earthquakes" or something like that. I noticed that Lucy Jones contributed to it, but also noticed that the newsgroup appeared to be degenerating with junk and debates over astrologically-induced earthquake predictions. Have you tried that one already? Carl Sramek ...
- Prev by Subject: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] [SEAOC] Seismic Evaluation of Residential Buildings
- Next by Subject: [SEAOC] RE: [SEAOC] aircraft on bridges
- Previous by thread: [SEAOC] Re: Gyp. board shear walls in LA
- Next by thread: [SEAOC] Steel frame design