Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
[SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Wind Pressure Coefficients (Cq)[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)power.net
- Subject: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Wind Pressure Coefficients (Cq)
- From: smthengr(--nospam--at)sirius.com (Jeff Smith)
- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 10:31:09 -0800
I would suggest that you get a copy of the wind commentary to the UBC, call 209 682-6026. (I have the 1991 edition, Is the 1994 version available?) I have found it to be a good reference. It also references ASCE 7-88. The commentary mentions that Cq for open frame towers is conservative, but for tall flexible towers Ce is not. The UBC does not provide guidance for dynamic effects, icing and increase wind speeds at hills and escarpments. I realize I did not answer your question, but these references should help. Jeff Smith >Can someone explain why the wind pressure coefficient (Cq) for Open-Frame >towers (UBC 94) is so much higher than other structures? According to UBC 94 >Sec. 1621, Open-Frame Towers are "Radio towers and other towers of trussed >construction ..." I suspect shape factor of assembled trusses has something >to do with it. > >Secondly, I am designing 60' tall x 15' sqaure open tower, assembled with >four steel tube columns at the corners and connected at the top with steel >tube beams. No diagonal members in between the columns; just tall free >standing columns. What Cq factor should be used? > >Brad > >... ...
- Prev by Subject: [SEAOC] RE: [SEAOC] Welded Rebar advise needed - Thank you All
- Next by Subject: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Wind Pressure Coefficients (Cq)
- Previous by thread: [SEAOC] Wind Pressure Coefficients (Cq)
- Next by thread: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Wind Pressure Coefficients (Cq)