Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
[SEAOC] Basic Roof Rafter Analysis Question[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: <seaoc(--nospam--at)power.net>
- Subject: [SEAOC] Basic Roof Rafter Analysis Question
- From: "DW" <wish(--nospam--at)cyberg8t.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 00:35:11 -0700
Mark (Shake4Bake), It's not whether I choose to design for wind or seismic. Wind will govern because it will yield the largest lateral force against the building when the numbers are run. Even if an earthquake is a greater threat, the resulting load at 18.6% of the structures weight will not exceed the force of a 70 mph wind in exposure C. The structure is designed for the worst case - regardless of wind or seismic. What my comment meant is that the difference in weight is not sufficient to cause the lateral weight of the structure to govern over the current wind load. For example: Assume a 17 psf wind load 17.4*(8/2+5)=156.6 plf Now assume seismic - 0.186((20psf*8ft/2*2+30ft*15.5psf)=116.25 plf Therefore wind still governs at 156.6 plf. The seismic considered the dead load at 15.5 psf for the roof with a lightweight tile (7.0 psf) and 20 psf for the exterior stud walls with stucco finish. There is quite some room to increase the roof load before the lateral due to seismic will govern. This is typical of tract homes. The 40' depth of diaphragm is a bit excessive for a house this size and is usually around 30 feet front to rear. In the transverse direction seismic will more often govern due to the depth of diaphragm, but this is not the critical direction since the distributed diaphragm force will be directed into more shear wall than in the longitudinal direction. So, to put it to rest, seismic is not this critical issue here, but rather the gravity load and it's effect out-of-plane on the exterior bearing walls (which becomes a function of how well the rafter ties work) and deflection of the rafters (which is not as critical on a gabled roof). Therefore, it the rafter is designed within allowable bending stress and the intermediate support is positively connected to an interior bearing wall - the roof should be considered safe. Dennis Wish ...
- Prev by Subject: [SEAOC] [SEAOC] terminology -Reply
- Next by Subject: [SEAOC] digest
- Previous by thread: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Repair of damaged wood columns (Rot & Termite damage)
- Next by thread: [SEAOC] Wind loading vs. Seismic loading