Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
[SEAOC] ATC 19, "Structural Response Modification Factors"[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)power.net
- Subject: [SEAOC] ATC 19, "Structural Response Modification Factors"
- From: fmcclure(--nospam--at)ccnet.com
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 1996 00:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
According to a recent Applied Technology Council Report, "ATC 19, Structural Response Modification Factors", 1995, on page 9, are the following conclusions: "Recent studies by researchers (e.g. Bertero, 1986) and design professionals, including Project ATC-34, have identified MAJOR SHORTCOMINGS in the values and formulation of the response modification factors used in seismic codes in the United States. "1. A single value of R for all buildings of a given framing type, irrespective of building height, plan geometry, and framing layout, CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED. "2. The use of the values assigned to R for some framing systems WILL LIKELY NOT produce the desired performance in the design earthquake. "3. The response modification factor is intended, in part, to account for the ductility of the framing system. Recognizing that a constant ductility ratio CANNOT be used to uniformly reduce elastic spectral demands to design (inelastic) spectral demands (measured typically as base shear), R must be period-dependent. This dependence is recognized in the Eurocode and the Mexican Code (see Chapter 3 for further discussion). "4. The reserve strength (strength in excess of the design strength) of buildings designed in different seismic regions will LIKE VARY SUBSTANTIALLY. Given the reserve strength is a key component of R (see Chapter 4), R should be dependent on either the seismic zone or some ratio of gravity to seismic loads. "5. Seismic design using the response modification factors listed in seismic codes and guidelines in the United States will most probably NOT RESULT in a uniform level of risk for all seismic framing systems." (Emphasis added). In other words, according to ATC-19, the fundamental basis (the use of uniform values of structural response modification factors that vary with the building framing types regardless of building period) for the 1994 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and the 1994 Uniform Building Code Provisions seismic provisions is "fatally flawed." For additional information concerning how to obtain ATC-19, call (415) 595-1542 or FAX (415) 593-2320. Let's hear some discussion about these conclusions in ATC-19. Frank McClure fmcclure(--nospam--at)ccnet.com File ATC191.txt ...
- Prev by Subject: [SEAOC] Asking for information
- Next by Subject: [SEAOC] ATC 19, "Structural Response Modification Factors"
- Previous by thread: [SEAOC] Special Services
- Next by thread: [SEAOC] ATC 19, "Structural Response Modification Factors"