Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
[SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Proposed voluntary vendor standards[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)power.net
- Subject: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Proposed voluntary vendor standards
- From: Shafat Qazi <seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 13:27:06 -0800
Dear Mark: I like all the points except the first one. If we allow vendors to announce product updates, they are then advertizing their product via the update announcement. Consider an email like this: "The XYZ technologies, developers of a leading Structural Analysis software are proud to announce their new release of this world famous software package. Version 3.0 is packed with new features and is available to new users for only $99. This is half the price of our competing software. To take advantage of this competitive upgrade, please visit our web site at http://www.xyz.com" Feel free to add comments to this thread. Shafat At 05:21 PM 11/29/96 GMT, you wrote: >Ok, here is my proposal that you will hopefully comment on. > >1. Vendors will not post advertisements. Announcements of version >upgrades or new products limited to a few (<10?) lines are >appropriate. These should contain an e-mail address where interested >parties can respond. > >2. Vendors should reply only to individuals in reference to generic >requests for information about software. > >3. Users should carry on tech support type dialogs with vendors by >private e-mail. > >4. Vendors may participate in general discussions of the types of >activities in which their software is involved. Areas might include >modeling for a developer of FEM solutions or office accounting >practices by a developer of accounting software. > >5. Vendors may reply publicly to any messages containing falsehoods >concerning their product. Such replies should quote the falsehood >verbatim and respond narrowly to the falsehood. > >6. In all cases, vendors should refrain from promoting their products >publicly (other than in the ways stated above) and refrain from >criticizing the products of their competitors. > >The idea of a separate posting area is also good though I suspect most >will refer interested parties to their web sites, if they have one. > > >Mark E. Deardorff, SE >Deardorff & Deardorff, Inc. >San Diego, CA >MarkD(--nospam--at)DandDEng.com > >... > > ...
- Prev by Subject: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Projects
- Next by Subject: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Proposed voluntary vendor standards
- Previous by thread: [SEAOC] Proposed voluntary vendor standards
- Next by thread: [SEAOC] Re: [SEAOC] Proposed voluntary vendor standards