Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

# Fwd: Re: Isolated pad footings - To tie or Not to tie?

• Subject: Fwd: Re: Isolated pad footings - To tie or Not to tie?
• From: rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org (Richard Lewis)
• Date: 30 Jul 1997 14:18:38 GMT

```Dennis:

I feel that while it is true that "tying the footings will not prevent a =
differential settlement", I do believe that a moment carrying =
connection, between the tie-beam and the post, would greatly alleviate =
the effect of vertical displacement caused by differential settlements, =
on to your truss superstructure. This, on this account alone, should be =
a requirement only if you are expecting substantial differential =
settlements. In general, large total settlements are likely to be =
accompanied by large differential settlements.

As a separate consideration, if you do consider a lateral restraint =
necessary, and wish to depend upon the patio slab for this, you might =
wish to compute the order of available reastraint that the patio slab is =
likely to offer. The weight of the patio slab, multiplied by the =
applicable coefficient of friction, should serve as a good estimate of =
the available restraint. If the available restraint is adequate, with a =
factor of safety, you might like to connect the post, through =
reinforcement flaring out, in a semicircular fashion, into the slab for =
some distance, even if the slab itself is unreinforced. Check the =
tensile stresses, in the slab, at the termination of the reinforcement.

I have successfuly used something very similar, by depending upon the =
reinforced floor slab for connecting the two opposite columns of a gable =
frame, 120'-0" apart, and subjected to a horizontal column reaction. I =
used this technique as an alternate to connecting the two opposite =
columns through a 120'-0" tie-beam, and in preference to the even more =
difficult alternate of having to design the isolated footings, for the =
hrizontal reaction.

Rizwan Mirza, P.E.
amirr(--nospam--at)paknet1.ptc.com

--- Internet Message Header Follows ---
by host1.texramp.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA04610
for <rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 1997 04:04:20 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [203.135.0.2] by server1.seaoc.org (NTList 3.02.10) id
xa003689; Fri, 14 Feb 1997 01:59:18 -0800
(5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/14Apr96-0132PM)
id AA13948; Fri, 14 Feb 1997 14:56:50 +0500
Received: by aamirr with Microsoft Mail
id <01BC1A85.D5D1CBC0@aamirr>; Fri, 14 Feb 1997 14:46:17 +-500
Message-Id: <01BC1A85.D5D1CBC0@aamirr>
From: ARW <amirr(--nospam--at)paknet1.ptc.pk>
To: "'seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org'" <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
Subject: Re: Isolated pad footings - To tie or Not to tie?
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 14:46:05 +-500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Loop: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Info: [SEAOC]
Precedence: list
X-ListMember: rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org [seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org]

__________________________________________________

Richard Lewis, P.E.
Missionary TECH Team
rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org

The service mission like-minded Christian organizations
may turn to for technical assistance and know-how.

```