Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Fwd: Re: Deck structure attached through Stucco

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Bob Shilling wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 14 Feb 1997 AnandNene(--nospam--at)aol.com wrote:
> 
> > I am working on a deck design for a house in Berkeley.  The deck is about
9
> > ft. above grade and is 10 ft. from the house back wall.  I typically
remove
> > stucco, provide flashing and bolt new ledger to existing rim joist.  I
have
> > seen some contractors attaching the deck ledger directly through the
stucco.
> >  My client was advised by a contractor that removal of stucco is not
> > necessary.  Obviously this is cheaper solution, but I am not comfortable
with
> > this situation.  I have advised my clients accordingly.
> >
> > Any thoughts, comments ??
> 
> First, you are the Engineer, the contractor who advised your client is
> NOT.
> 
> Second, if the stucco is left in place, the fasteners used to connect the
> ledger to the rim joist will now have bending applied to them in addition
> to shear and pullout. You can do calcs for this, but I still think it's a
> bad detail. In either case you need to protect the (E) construction from
> moisture. It seems that in your solution, you deal with this explicitly
> with flashing, etc. The contractors solution does not deal with it.
> 
> Bob
> 
> .    .    .   .   .  .  .  .  . . . . . ...........................
> Bob Shilling, SE             Berkeley, CA          shilling(--nospam--at)emf.net
> 
I agree with Bob Shilling. While contractors have valuable skills
in assessing construction costs, techniques and the ability to visualize
in 3-D, typically they have a "12 month mentality". I would be surprised
if your fee (there I go again!) is adequate on this type if project to
worry about structural separation and waterproofing 3-5 years from now.
I recommend you remove the stucco, place the ledger directly against the
framing, build the deck, flash and counter-flash and repair the stucco.
Done deal.
Regards,
Bill Allen


--- Internet Message Header Follows ---
Received: from server1.seaoc.org (bqe.com [204.140.166.34])
	by host1.texramp.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA02011
	for <rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 1997 13:03:56 -0600 (CST)
Received: from darius.concentric.net by server1.seaoc.org (NTList 3.02.10) id
ka003728; Fri, 14 Feb 1997 10:52:56 -0800
Received: from cliff.cris.com (cliff.cris.com [199.3.12.45])
	by darius.concentric.net (8.8.5/(97/02/12 3.22))
	id NAA17764; Fri, 14 Feb 1997 13:50:13 -0500 (EST)
	[1-800-745-2747 The Concentric Network]
Errors-To: <ballense(--nospam--at)concentric.net>
Received: from BAllen (61027d0011la.concentric.net [206.173.241.167])
	by cliff.cris.com (8.8.5)
	id NAA15066; Fri, 14 Feb 1997 13:50:11 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3304B3FB.7645(--nospam--at)concentric.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 10:50:35 -0800
From: Bill Allen <ballense(--nospam--at)concentric.net>
Reply-To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Subject: Re: Deck structure attached through Stucco
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970214101600.7242C-100000(--nospam--at)emf.emf.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Error-To: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Loop: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Info: [SEAOC]
Owner: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-POP3-Rcpt: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Sender: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Precedence: list
X-ListMember: rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org [seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org]


__________________________________________________

Richard Lewis, P.E.
Missionary TECH Team
rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org

The service mission like-minded Christian organizations
may turn to for technical assistance and know-how.