Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Fwd: Code official's jurisdiction

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I am seeking some information contained in a newsletter (unfortunately I
don't have a better reference).  The content of this article was in
regard to the procedure by which code-enforcement personnel could reject a
rational analysis.  In other words, what does a code-enforcement officer
have to do (i.e. provide a signed and sealed justification?) to reject the
signed and sealed calculations/ documents of a professional engineer?

Thanks.

Sergio Fagundo



--- Internet Message Header Follows ---
Received: from server1.seaoc.org (bqe.com [204.140.166.34])
	by host1.texramp.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA02289
	for <rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 15:44:40 -0600 (CST)
Received: from coeds.eng.miami.edu by server1.seaoc.org (NTList 3.02.10) id
ya004002; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 13:35:04 -0800
Received: by coeds.eng.miami.edu (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
	id AA20815; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 16:34:43 -0500
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 16:34:43 -0500 (EST)
From: Sergio Fagundo <sfagundo(--nospam--at)coeds.eng.miami.edu>
To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Subject: Code official's jurisdiction
Message-Id: <Pine.ULT.3.93.970218163116.20121B-100000(--nospam--at)coeds.eng.miami.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Error-To: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Loop: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Info: [SEAOC]
Owner: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-POP3-Rcpt: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Sender: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Precedence: list
X-ListMember: rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org [seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org]


__________________________________________________

Richard Lewis, P.E.
Missionary TECH Team
rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org

The service mission like-minded Christian organizations
may turn to for technical assistance and know-how.