Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Fwd: Re: building code minimums for wood frame

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

> Well, some of you people have to face the fact that this is a FREE
> MARKET ECONOMY!!!! (at least here in the United States).  Communist
> Countires are the only ones I know of that have a bunch of politians sit
> around and decide how important everyone is to their society, and then
> set their pay accordingly.  There are some socialist countires that lean
> in this direction with some professions.  As far as Soviet Engineers go,
> I have one as a neighbor now who came to this country a few years ago. 
> He was a Mechanical Engineer, highly trained and highly skilled at his
> profession.  How he cleans out peolpes clogged sewer pipes.  He owns a
> small roto-rooter type company.  It is a family operation and he has
> three trucks.  It is very interesting talking to this man. While he
> would like to be doing Engineering instead, he would never consider
> going back to the USSR.  Even back in the peak of their economy.  He
> makes a good living, and supports his stay at home wife and three
> children well.  He makes more money than I do.  
> So what!!   I hope more and more people make more than I do.  When they
> save up all their moeny and get ready to build that new dream home,
> maybe they will hire me to do the structural desgin of their home.  
> You people need to stop looking around at what everyone else is doing,
> and how much money they are making and feeling sorry for yourselves, and
> learn how to make the free market economy work for you.  Don't sit
> around and talk about the people in our industry that have failed, but
> look at the ones who do succeed and learn from them.
> I don't want any Government agency telling me what I should charge for
> my services.  I do not want any portion of my SEAOC dues to go to trying
> to figure out how we can all be paid what we think we are worth.  If you
> want that then you should form a Union.  That is their function.
> I am sure Mr. Foley shops around for nearly everything he purchases. 
> There is a market for Mercedes Benz and Chevrolet.  The consumer knows
> there is a difference.  Both Chevy and MB are successful, and their is a
> market for both.  And yes, there are and should be certain minimum
> standards for any product that involves safety of the public, just as
> there are for auto's and structural engineering.  
> People in this economy have an obligation to shop around for the best
> price they can get for a product, and that includes Structural
> Engineering.  And there is nothing we can do one way or another about
> that.  All of those in our profession should provide a certain minimum
> standard in the product we provide.  And if we violate that, we should
> have our license revoked.  But then we need to decide if we are going to
> sell Chevrolet's or Cadillac's.  There is a market for both.  But even
> Cadillac has it competitors, and they must provide their high quality
> product at a competative price.  

Here's the fallacy in your argument:

Ours is a "Service-Oriented Industry" and it is not approriate to compare
it with
the sale of cars!

I am not saying that I fully agree with a centralised fee system etc. but I
do 
believe that your argument is a wee bit unfair.

-Swaminathan Krishnan



> At whatever level we decide to provide our services, there will be
> competition, and the Client will get the best price he can for the
> product.  
> We reward those in our economy who can produce a high quality product
> and can deliver that high quailty product at the lowest price.
> Learn the rules of the game, learn how to compete, and you will be
> successful.
> 
> Lynn Howard
> 



--- Internet Message Header Follows ---
Received: from server1.seaoc.org (bqe.com [204.140.166.34])
	by host1.texramp.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA09795
	for <rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org>; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 01:12:07 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mailhost.worldnet.att.net by server1.seaoc.org (NTList
3.02.10) id ea005022; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 23:03:01 -0800
Received: from default ([207.147.201.91]) by mtigwc02.worldnet.att.net
          (post.office MTA v2.0 0613 ) with ESMTP id AAA24322
          for <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 07:01:01 +0000
From: "Swaminathan Krishnan" <SKRISHNAN(--nospam--at)worldnet.att.net>
To: <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
Subject: Re: building code minimums for wood frame
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:49:22 -0800
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <19970301070059.AAA24322@default>
Reply-To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Error-To: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Loop: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Info: [SEAOC]
Owner: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-POP3-Rcpt: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Sender: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Precedence: list
X-ListMember: rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org [seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org]


__________________________________________________

Richard Lewis, P.E.
Missionary TECH Team
rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org

The service mission like-minded Christian organizations
may turn to for technical assistance and know-how.