Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Fwd: Re: M: Just Another Opinion[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: wai(--nospam--at)euken.com
- Subject: Fwd: Re: M: Just Another Opinion
- From: rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org (Richard Lewis)
- Date: 04 Aug 1997 15:42:59 GMT
At 09:40 AM 3/18/97 -0800, you wrote: >>Me too! There is no need to create separate lists when only twenty or >>thirty individuals currently post on a regular basis. How many posts >>would there be if Dennis, Sandy, and Bill all stopped participating? I >>support the idea of keeping one list, but having everyone code their >>"subjects" for quick sorting by the reader: ....... >>Stan R. Caldwell, P.E. > >I agree with Stan. There are Email applications that will automatically >"filter" mail (Eudora is one). For example I use this feature to but all >of the SEAOC mail into a separate folder so it doesn't interfere with my >business mail. I then automatically separate the SEAOC mail into separate >"mail boxes" depending on the topic such as Steel concrete etc. This is >based on the subject header. The subject header can be several words but >as long as one of the words is "concrete" Eudora will automatically put >into the correct mail box. I have to add new "filters as new topics occur >but it generally works very well. In the ideal world everyone would use >the same key words in the subject header (hint hint). If there were a >topic I had no interest in then I could have Eudora automatically transfer >this mail to the trash. This approach seems to be more efficient then >having several lists servers. > >Thanks > Harry Well, I disagree with you guys. I don't understand where this negativism is coming from. Is that just the resistance to the change :>? All you would really need to do is to subscribe to the new list server if you are interested in the subject. Not a big deal. It would not require any additional resources ( as far as I understand). It would not increase the Internet traffic either. If Shafat and Dennis are willing to make an effort to set it up for us, great. My thanks to them. Not all of us want to sort the e-mail automatically from the in-box. Ones again, I support the idea. Sasha Itsekson --- Internet Message Header Follows --- Received: from server1.seaoc.org (bqe.com [188.8.131.52]) by host1.texramp.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA03296 for <rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 12:48:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from astsoft.com by server1.seaoc.org (NTList 3.02.10) id za009801; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 10:41:24 -0800 Received: from hdesign.astsoft.com (port13.astsoft.com [184.108.40.206]) by doorstop (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA21370 for <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 10:29:41 -0800 Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 10:29:41 -0800 Message-Id: <220.127.116.11.19970318103207.2f0f384e(--nospam--at)bayweb.net> X-Sender: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org From: Alexander Itsekson <engineers(--nospam--at)huntingtondesign.com> Subject: Re: M: Just Another Opinion Reply-To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org Error-To: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org X-Loop: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org X-Info: [SEAOC] Owner: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org X-POP3-Rcpt: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org Precedence: list X-ListMember: rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org [seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org] __________________________________________________ Richard Lewis, P.E. Missionary TECH Team rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org The service mission like-minded Christian organizations may turn to for technical assistance and know-how.
- Prev by Subject: Fwd: M: Just Another Opinion
- Next by Subject: Fwd: Re: M: Just Another Opinion
- Previous by thread: Fwd: M: Just Another Opinion
- Next by thread: Fwd: Re: M: Just Another Opinion