Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Fwd: Opinions for List Server[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: wai(--nospam--at)euken.com
- Subject: Fwd: Opinions for List Server
- From: rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org (Richard Lewis)
- Date: 04 Aug 1997 18:16:26 GMT
Let me start by poorly paraphrasing an old quote: "Be careful what you ask for because you may just get it" Mr. Wright said my post was not called for. My OPINION was specifically requested by Shafat and Dennis and several others who complained that not enough people were giving their OPINION. You got exactly what you asked for; MY OPINION. That said, I apologize if some people took my message as a flame against Dennis, Bill, or Frank. Quite the contrary. I think everyone forgot the original question. People are complaining about too many posts. Several people have suggested some interesting and innovative ways to deal with deleting and sorting numerous E-Mails. MANY of the posts lately have been directly between the three mentioned gentlemen in a style that IN MY OPINION is more conducive to a "chat room". What a great idea!! Instead of dividing the list into subjects I was suggesting that we have a "chat room" for those who like to go on and on and on about one subject and leave the original list for briefer technical discussions as has been in the past (strictly stating my OPINION here). I found Dennis', Bill's, and Frank's initial posts very interesting but IN MY OPINION the subject was beat to death at the expense of other people trying to ask or entertain other questions. I am not suggesting that these people not post their messages or that there was anything inappropriate about them, but that we provide these type of discussions a better forum to ALLEVIATE (as in reduce not ELIMINATE) the problem which prompted Shafat and others to ask our OPINIONS in the first place. Everyone (should be?) is entitled to their own OPINION especially when it is specifically asked for. I am sorry if some people took offense; it was not intended that way. Thomas Hunt --- Internet Message Header Follows --- Received: from server1.seaoc.org (bqe.com [18.104.22.168]) by host1.texramp.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA20019 for <rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 1997 10:27:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from juliette.fabrik.com by server1.seaoc.org (NTList 3.02.10) id wa010110; Thu, 20 Mar 1997 08:19:14 -0800 Received: from primus.fabrik.com ([22.214.171.124]) by juliette.fabrik.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-0U10) with ESMTP id AAB130 for <SEAOC(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 1997 08:13:57 -0800 Received: by primus.fabrik.com (Fabrik F07.0-000) id Megw.1012427 ; Thu, 20 Mar 1997 08:15:33 -0800 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 07:51:00 -0800 From: "Hunt, Tom" <tom.hunt(--nospam--at)fluordaniel.com> Subject: Opinions for List Server To: SEAOC(--nospam--at)seaoc.org Message-ID: <Megw.1012427(--nospam--at)primus.fabrik.com> Reply-To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org Error-To: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org X-Loop: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org X-Info: [SEAOC] Owner: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org X-POP3-Rcpt: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org X-Sender: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org Precedence: list X-ListMember: rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org [SEAOC(--nospam--at)seaoc.org] __________________________________________________ Richard Lewis, P.E. Missionary TECH Team rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org The service mission like-minded Christian organizations may turn to for technical assistance and know-how.
- Prev by Subject: Fwd: Re: Opinions for List -power from the community
- Next by Subject: Fwd: Re: Opinions for List Server
- Previous by thread: Fwd: Re: NEW - SEAOC CHAT ROOM
- Next by thread: Fwd: Re: Opinions for List Server