Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Fwd: Re: GOOD STRUCTURAL PROGRAMS

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Having used both text-based (SAP5, SAP90) and graphic input types (e.g.,
Visual Analysis), I have to say I prefer the latter.  The engineer still
has total control, but he can see visually if the model accurately
reflects his intent.  It's too easy with a text-based input to create a
model with unintended anomalies.

>----------
>From: 	John S. McDonald[SMTP:jsm(--nospam--at)mail.kpff.com]
>Sent: 	Wednesday, March 19, 1997 8:07 AM
>To: 	seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
>Subject: 	Re: GOOD STRUCTURAL PROGRAMS
>
>I prefer the CSI programs (SAP90, ETABS & SAP2000)
>The user creates a text input file and then when the architect
>changes something  the engineer can easily remodel the 
>structure...the engineer has total control 
>over the structure... and if the engineer is gone, another engineer 
>can easily modify the text file.  With some of the other programs, this is 
>not as clear..
>
>These programs may have a longer learning curve, but once the 
>format is understood, it is really very logical... you can tell a 
>structural engineer wrote the program and not a computer 
>scientist.  And, because the input file is slightly more complex, it 
>requires more thought.... and hopefully more careful thought.  With 
>some other analysis programs, the input is so easy, an inexperienced 
>engineer could model something, and get results and think it is all 
>correct.  
>
>Respectfully,
>
>John S. McDonald
>
>


--- Internet Message Header Follows ---
Received: from server1.seaoc.org (bqe.com [204.140.166.34])
	by host1.texramp.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA01233
	for <rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 18:17:46 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [198.91.8.10] by server1.seaoc.org (NTList 3.02.10) id
ja009993; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 16:05:06 -0800
Received: from ds9.ch2m.com (ds9.ch2m.com [130.77.4.78]) by odo.CH2M.COM
(8.6.12/8.6.10) with ESMTP id RAA26673 for <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>; Wed, 19 Mar
1997 17:03:00 -0700
Received: from SMTPGATE.ch2m.com (smtpgate.ch2m.com [130.77.4.228]) by
ds9.ch2m.com (8.6.12/8.6.10) with SMTP id QAA14451 for <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>;
Wed, 19 Mar 1997 16:59:53 -0700
Received: by SMTPGATE.ch2m.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server Internet
Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63)
	id <01BC3487.89A91480(--nospam--at)SMTPGATE.ch2m.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 17:03:59 -0700
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=CH2MHILL%l=CH2MHILL/GATE/001E7ED9(--nospam--at)SMTPGATE.ch2m.com>
From: "Horning, Dick/CVO" <DHorning(--nospam--at)CH2M.com>
To: "seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org" <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
Subject: RE: GOOD STRUCTURAL PROGRAMS
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 16:36:00 -0700
X-Mailer:  Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version
4.0.994.63
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Error-To: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Loop: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Info: [SEAOC]
Owner: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-POP3-Rcpt: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Sender: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Precedence: list
X-ListMember: rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org [seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org]


__________________________________________________

Richard Lewis, P.E.
Missionary TECH Team
rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org

The service mission like-minded Christian organizations
may turn to for technical assistance and know-how.