Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Fwd: Re: Min. Code Design

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
In a message dated 97-04-21 19:57:44 EDT, you write:

<< Subj:	Min. Code Design
 Date:	97-04-21 19:57:44 EDT
 From:	tomlong(--nospam--at)silcom.com (Tom Long)
 Reply-to:	seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
 To:	seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org (seaoc)
 
 Caught in between:
 
 There has been some discussion in our office about designing to the minimum
 standards that the 1994 UBC will allow. 
 
 I am wondering what other office policies have implemented for their design
 standards, any comments?   
 



     I use the city of L.A. code/ guidelines for nearly all projects. I state
this in our contracts now as a condition of accepting a job. I have lost a
small percentage ( <5% ? ) because of this. Since this was put together by a
task force of government, seaosc, and industry members studying the failures
of the Northridge earthquake, i question using less. This comes up frequently
for us since L.A. city , L.A. county , and Ventura County require these
minimums but in some cities within the counties UBC minimums are allowed so
you can have different minimum requirements across the street ( in Westlake
village, even across the street within the same city because it has the
county line thru it ) .
     I do get comments about " overengineering " from the field the first
time a contractor / developer builds to this level but then they get used to
it and accept it. It would be alot easier to explain if everyone in seismic
zone 4 were using the higher minimums. Same with structural observation.

     Tom Harris, SE
     Thousand Oaks, CA




--- Internet Message Header Follows ---
Received: from server1.seaoc.org (bqe.com [204.140.166.34])
	by host1.texramp.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA26353
	for <rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 12:38:36 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from emout11.mx.aol.com by server1.seaoc.org (NTList 3.02.13) id
fa019375; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 10:29:12 -0700
Received: (from root@localhost)
	  by emout11.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0)
	  id NAA01108 for seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org;
	  Tue, 22 Apr 1997 13:26:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 13:26:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: HARRISENGR(--nospam--at)aol.com
Message-ID: <970422132645_1321058536(--nospam--at)emout11.mail.aol.com>
To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Subject: Re: Min. Code Design
Reply-To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Error-To: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Loop: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Info: [SEAOC]
Owner: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-POP3-Rcpt: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
X-Sender: seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
Precedence: list
X-ListMember: rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org [seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org]


__________________________________________________

Richard Lewis, P.E.
Missionary TECH Team
rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org

The service mission like-minded Christian organizations
may turn to for technical assistance and know-how.