Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: COMP - AISC Autocad Files

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I guess at this point, it really doesn't matter what is beneath my GUI. I
guess just about all OS have some sort of UI (some G some not) that
interfaces the user with assembly language. The point is that I don't deal
with a C:>, eight character file names, or any DOS commands whatsoever. I
can run just about as many apps concurrently as I want. If I want to delete
a file, I do not type DELETE C:\DIRECTORY\SUBDIRECTORY\...\filename.ext.
This is true for any other file management commands. I can copy and paste
from one document to another. None of this can be done in DOS. If DOS is in
there, it is buried so deep that I can't see it anymore (unlike Win3.1).
Win95 does have a DOS shell and gives a DOS window. I used to use this a
lot when I first went to windows because I was more familiar with the DOS
commands. I don't use it anymore.

So, from a user's point of view, DOS is dead although the spirit may

Bill Allen

> >Not on my system. I have Win95B that was installed w/o a "DOS" layer.
> >faster that way especially since I don't know what "DOS" is.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Bill Allen
> >
> Beg to differ with you Bill, but Windows 95 (any version) is simply
> and DOS 8.0. The difference is that the operating system automatically
> launches Windows95 upon startup. You do have the option of starting in
> MS-DOS mode by hitting the F8 key when you see the CMOS information as
> boot-up. Then choose to strart in MS-DOS mode.
> If you want to use the old DOS tools, you need to copy them form the 95
> in the directory OLDDOS.
> The major change is that virtually anything you can do in DOS is
> into Windows and you no longer need your Autoexec.bat and Config.sys
> If you choose to operate in DOS mode, you must have an Autoexec.bat and
> Config.sys file - same as you used to.
> Dennis