Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: asd vs lrfd

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Christopher Wright wrote:

> >Reasons not to use LRFD:
> >1.     Service load criteria frequently control
> [...]

> LRFD may be an OK approach for some types of building design using
> set-piece, quasi-static loading scenarios, but I can't imagine it will
> replace honest-to-God stress or load analysis anywhere else.

I may be missing your point, but just for the record, AASHTO insists that
it is making LRFD *the* design code for highway bridges, which of course
means heavy involvement of all kinds of live loads.