Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Continuing Professional Development

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Charles Greenlaw wrote:[...]

> future as an administrative regulation. (It appears from several unrelated
> contexts that the current Calif Board may not be held in the highest esteem
> by the legislature; perhaps delegation of Contin Ed authority to the Board
> does not appeal to the legislators.)
> Nobody implied however that voluntary professional learning was ineffective
> or undesirable.

Although apparently a number of folks would disagree with that statement...

> SEAOC has been debating whether to advocate a particular mandatory
> continuing education program. The reason given in favor is to pre-empt the
> PE Board's version, whatever it might be.

Does this statement imply an antagonistic relationship between the profession
and that California licensing board?