Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: WOOD - Load bearing studs in a party wall

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
You won't gain any brownie points by asking for the blocking, it's labor
intensive and if you extend the blocking between the studs, you may be
defeating the function of the sound/fire separation.

I don't think the l/d has to be the same for both axis, only with
allowable limits.

Bill Allen wrote:

> I am more comfortable with specifying the blocking (than considering
> the
> section completely laterally braced with sheathing on one side only)
> and I
> do not think
> it is too conservative. I will specify blocking such that the l/d in
> the
> weak axis
> matches the l/d in the strong axis, or whatever I need to develop the
> axial
> load
> plus 5 psf. Thanks for your response.
> Is this listserv great, or what?
> Bill Allen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dennismc <dennismc(--nospam--at)>
> To: seaoc(--nospam--at) <seaoc(--nospam--at)>
> Date: Wednesday, October 22, 1997 7:50 PM
> Subject: Re: WOOD - Load bearing studs in a party wall
> >I always check studs as columns with bending.  If there is no
> sheathing
> >on one side, the distance between the top & bottom plates or to
> >intermediate blocking for bracing is the unbraced length for the weak
> >axis of the stud.  The worst case is usually that additional blocking
> is
> >provided to make the studs work.  This seems like a conservative
> >approach, others may argue the sheathing on the other side keeps the
> >full section braced.
> >
> >Dennis McCroskey