Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Re: CAD Programs[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
- Subject: Re: CAD Programs
- From: poly(--nospam--at)flash.net (Bill Polhemus)
- Date: Sun, 09 Nov 1997 21:41:14 -0600
- Newsgroups: SEAOC.Mailing.List
In article <971106105351_193441863(--nospam--at)emout06.mail.aol.com>, SWJanitor(--nospam--at)aol.com wrote: >The larger the structural firm, the more likely >they are to use MicroStation... the smaller the firm, the more Autocad is >used. > >Can you all please comment on why this is? > >JBarr >Intergraph Developer I've answered this question numerous times (and you oughta know it yourself, Jim!) Intergraph's IGDS was the hands-down popular system back in the late-70s to early-80s era, before PCs became anywhere NEAR powerful enough to be considered serious contenders. Large firms, including the big multi-discipline "Engineering Contractors" such as Brown and Root, Foster-Wheeler, M. W. Kellogg, Fluor, etc., bought Intergraph systems to the tune of millions of dollars worth of investment. They developed an impressive legacy of cell libraries, custom design automation routines, etc., that represented an additional capital outlay as well. When PCs became the NEW workstation, and as they've replaced the old UNIX (or CLIX, in this case) workstations, Microstation came to the fore in these types of companies because of these facts. The gradual evolution of Microstation's interface and capabilities took the Intergraph users right along with them. As an illustration of just why legacy of applications, user training (and thereby, preference) and automation are so important to Microstation's user base, consider that another arena where you'll find Microstation dominant, is in the Civil Engineering firm, even the smaller ones. They also used Intergraph early on, because THEIR clients, notably public entities such as state DOTs and the Corps of Engineers, had settled on Intergraph as their CAD standard, and the Civil consultants HAD to cough up the investment bucks for those systems. I work for a civil firm, in which we have a small structural group, and Microstation is used in about 90% of our projects for this reason. Only when the occasional client, particularly private or industrial clients, insist on AutoCad, do we use that platform, most often by bringing in contract folks (because it is not worthwhile for us to keep people on staff just to use AutoCad occasionally, and you MUST "use it or lose it" when it comes to CAD skills).
- Re: CAD Programs
- From: SWJanitor
- Re: CAD Programs
- Prev by Subject: Re: CAD Programs
- Next by Subject: RE: CAD Programs
- Previous by thread: Re: CAD Programs
- Next by thread: RE: CAD Programs