Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Housing Performance Objectives

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
The point, Rick, is that this objective no longer reflects the needs of
society when the cost to repair is as devestating to a family as injury.
Rather than simply accept a supplemental explanation for the code, we need
to work on a new philosophy behind conventional framing methods. These need
to be based upon damage reduction (ecconomics) as well as life safety.

Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick.Drake(--nospam--at)fluordaniel.com <Rick.Drake(--nospam--at)fluordaniel.com>
To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
Date: Tuesday, December 02, 1997 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: Housing Performance Objectives


>     I believe that the code writers tried to better define the seismic
>     performance objectives in the 1996 UBC Supplement, Section 1624.1,
>     which states "The purpose of the earthquake provisions herein is
>     primarily to safeguard against major structural failures and loss of
>     life, not to limit damage or maintain function."
>
>     Rick Drake, SE
>     Fluor Daniel, Inc.