Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: File Backups

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
While I'm not as sharp about OS's as Dennis is, I would still be concerned
about Drivespace. You never get something for nothing. I also wouldn't think
that the Windows swap file issue matters since the swap file does not reside
on the compressed drive. The problem is that, when you try to copy a file
onto
either a "normal" floppy or Zip disk and there is no room, you get a simple
"disk
is full" message. This is not the case with a mounted drive (at least when I
did it
on an old version of Stacker). The thing crashed and I was up until 5:00 am
trying
to recover data. Even MS tech. support has told me that a drive set up for
Drive-
space is not as reliable as a standard drive. For those of you more
adventurous
than me, go ahead. Otherwise, buy more Zip disks.

Regards,
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: wish <wish(--nospam--at)cwia.com>
To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
Date: Monday, January 05, 1998 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: File Backups


>I believe the program Bill is refering to is Stacker.  Microsoft was sued
by
>the company that makes Stacker and the current version of Drivespace that
>comes with MS Plus is, infact, the Stacker technology. I tend to disagree
>with Bill, however, I never filled my drive completely - especially since
>Windows acts unpredicably when there is less than 10% of your drive left
for
>a swap file. I ruined an older drive because of this problem, not a
>compression problem.
>I have been using Drivespace for over three years and have used Stacker
>before that. Granted, the original version of Stacker was a bit
>unpredictable, but I have found Drivespace to be extremly stable. In fact,
I
>compress my Zip drives to obtain approximately 180 megs per disk. You need
>to have Drivespace installed and mount the drive, but it is a great way to
>keep your projects on the same disk.
>One warning, the previous version of compression called Doublespace from
>Microsoft was unstable and could, if you are using it, corrupt data.
>In anycase, whether or not you use a compression program, you need to make
>backups of your data at the very least. From one who has learned the hard
>way - you can take that advise to the bank.
>
>Dennis
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bill Allen <BAllenSE(--nospam--at)mail-gw2.pacbell.net>
>To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
>Date: Monday, January 05, 1998 4:54 PM
>Subject: Re: File Backups
>
>
>>I don't know if DriveSpace works similar to Stakker drives but, if it
does,
>>I have
>>to throw out some caution. I once had my HDD formatted as a Stakker drive.
>>Once
>>it became full, the drive crashed and it was nearly impossible to recover
>>the data.
>>I recommend that zip disks are cheap and don't mess with DriveSpace.
>>
>>Just my $0.02.
>>Regards,
>>Bill Allen
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: wish <wish(--nospam--at)cwia.com>
>>To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
>>Date: Monday, January 05, 1998 9:57 AM
>>Subject: Re: File Backups
>>
>>
>>>I've always been confused with rotational backups starting with a full
>>>backup and followed by two layers of changed files.
>>>I use tape backups for immediate protection of loaded programs and
support
>>>files that would be otherwise time consuming to reload. I backup my data
>>>files to Zip Disks, however not as frequently as I should. Once a project
>>is
>>>complete, the project file which contains all of the analysis and
>documents
>>>used in the project goes to a zip disk. I have used a second zip disk for
>>>protection, however I have never seen a zip disk go bad.
>>>I do use Drivespace compression on my zip disks so as to obtain close to
>>200
>>>megs of space. This is easier to retrieve than to try and zip the entire
>>>folder for later retrieval of a portion or one document.
>>>I find Tapes to be cumbersome overall and difficult to retrieve data
from.
>>>However, they are indespensible when needing to rebuild a hard drive that
>>>has been corrupted.
>>>Dennis Wish
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Richard Lewis <rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org>
>>>To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
>>>Date: Monday, January 05, 1998 8:24 AM
>>>Subject: Re: File Backups
>>>
>>>
>>>>We have had some discussion on hardware for backups, but now I would
like
>>>to
>>>>shift the focus to procedure and scheduling.  What I would like to see
is
>>>>other's opinions, strategies, etc. on backing up computer files.
>>>>
>>>>We currently use tape backup.  Every day we backup all the files that
>were
>>>>modified that day.  We use three tapes and rotate them when they fill
up.
>>>>When the third tape is full we begin again on the first.
>>>>
>>>>Periodically (we define periodically as whenever we think it is time) we
>>do
>>>a
>>>>total backup of the hard drive or only the directory that contains all
>the
>>>>project files.
>>>>
>>>>I would like to hear of a more systematic approach to scheduling backups
>>>and
>>>>using tapes from some of you experienced backuppers (new word).
>>>>__________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>Richard Lewis, P.E.
>>>>Missionary TECH Team
>>>>rlewis(--nospam--at)techteam.org
>>>>
>>>>The service mission like-minded Christian organizations
>>>>may turn to for technical assistance and know-how.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>