Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: Disaster dilemma[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
- Subject: RE: Disaster dilemma
- From: "Serroels, Chris/SAC" <CSerroel(--nospam--at)CH2M.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 17:14:18 -0700
How many architects have assisted in post-eq inspections in the past? If they are left out of the equation, are there enough building officials, civil engineers, and structural engineers to get the first pass inspections done in a timely manner. Do we really feel that they are not competent to make the assessments. If they receive the rapid evaluation training (ATC20) they should be able to make appropriate assessments. To be fair to the architects, we send a lot of young engineers out on these inspections (present company included). When I went out on Northridge it was a very intimidating experience. I was a pretty young engineer and my partner was in the same boat. What experience we did have was in bridge design. I feel that we made prudent decisions, but having an more experienced engineer on the team would of been extremely beneficial. Let's not sell displaced homeowners short by making them wait longer than they need to reoccupy their homes just because we have a grudge with architects. As a side note, I wonder if it would be possible to pair up inspection teams so that if there is an inexperienced engineer or architect that they go out with an experienced civil or structural engineer. I know that after an eq there is a fair amount of disarray no matter how good the planning, so logistically this may be hard to implement. Nevertheless, it may be something to consider. Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Allen,S.E. [SMTP:BAllenSE(--nospam--at)pacbell.net] > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 1998 1:46 PM > To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org > Subject: Re: Disaster dilemma > > Hey! It's our own damn fault by letting ICBO and BORPELS get away with > giving > the architect the same level of competency in structural engineering. > If you > don't like the way things are - complain to them!! > > Regards, > Bill Allen > > Tom Chiu wrote: > > > What! Architects to inspect damaged buildings, you must be kidding. > > No wonder, the green tags were changed to red tags, after the > engineers > > went inside the buildings. You see, the architects were too busy > > looking at the exterior of the buildings, checking out curtain > walls, > > carpeting etc. > > > > Tom Chiu, SE > > Thomas Engineering > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: Richard_Ranous/OES(--nospam--at)oes.ca.gov > [SMTP:Richard_Ranous/OES(--nospam--at)oes.ca.gov] > > > >Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 1998 9:49 AM > > > >To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org > > > >Subject: Re: Disaster dilema > > > > > > > > > > > >We should be able to handle most any request for assistance in > safety > > > >assessment. We have close to 6,000 individuals registered > between SEAOC, > > > >AIA, ACIA, ASCE, and CALBO. For Northridge we used 600 plus > around 200 > > > >from the Army Corps of Engineers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Re: Disaster dilemma
- From: Bill Allen,S.E.
- Re: Disaster dilemma
- Prev by Subject: Re: Disaster dilemma
- Next by Subject: Re: Disaster dilemma
- Previous by thread: Re: Disaster dilemma
- Next by thread: Re: Disaster dilemma