Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: Rigid frame deflections (again)
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
- Subject: Re: Rigid frame deflections (again)
- From: "T" <vicpeng(--nospam--at)vtcg.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 18:37:50 -0800
I haven't done the math yet but I wonder if the individual beam to col stiffnesses are the same for both frames then the more the drift is a function of individual col stiffness ( i.e. very stiff cols and not-so-stiff beams) it seems that the frame will tend to have less rigidity the longer the beam is. In the ridiculous case where beam to col stiffness tends to zero the cols will act more and more as isolated elements. ???? -----Original Message----- From: Kathleen A. O'Brien <wildwoman1(--nospam--at)compuserve.com> To: SEAOC Forum <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org> Date: Wednesday, January 21, 1998 5:29 PM Subject: Rigid frame deflections (again) Guys and Dolls: Now that I have the Steel Interchange sheet from Modern Steel Construction (4/93) which shows the quick hand-calc for rigid frame defelction, I have started using it. HOWEVER, I have noticed something very odd. Extremeley odd. The formulas for pinned and fixed bases follow (and please excuse the crummy formatting): drift = P*H(squared)/6E *(H/Icol + L/2Ibm) where P = load H= height of frame L=span of frame Icol= I of column Ibm= I of beam E=29000ksi For fixed-at-base frames: drfit=P*H(cubed)/12EIcol * (3K+2/6K+1) where K= Ibm*H/Icol*L everything else as above Now here is the strange part. I have two frames along line D in my project. One has a 17 foot span and the other a 7 foot span (L). Both of them are 10.5 feet high (H). And I am assuming: P = 1 kip for each frame (just getting relative rigidities at this point). Relative rigidity R is the inverse of the drift; i.e. 1/drift For both fixed and pinned at base calcs, my 7 foot long frame is stiffer than my 17 foot one. I have hunted HARD for errors in my calcs and I can't find any. I have done the calc both by hand and with a spreadsheet and I still get the same answer: the tall skinny frame is stiffer than the short fat one. I do not buy this. Has anyone else had this problem? Is it me? Is it the calcualtion?? Kate O'Brien Simi Valley, CA
- Prev by Subject: Re: Rigid frame deflections (again)
- Next by Subject: Re: Rigid frame deflections (again)
- Previous by thread: Re: Rigid frame deflections (again)
- Next by thread: Re: Rigid frame deflections (again)
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]