Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: Disaster dilemma[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
- Subject: RE: Disaster dilemma
- From: Richard_Ranous/OES(--nospam--at)oes.ca.gov
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 08:38:18 -0800
The AIA chapters in California play a large role in our safety assessment program. Of the 600 inidividuals we used during the Northridge response, about 30% per architects. Architects have been involved in evaluating the safety of damaged buildings since the Loma Prieta earthquake. They have been used along with building inspectors from both the private and public sector and have done a good job. Our total available resouces are about 6,000 of which 3,000 come from local government building departments. The remaining 3,000 come from the private sector with engineers making up a larger percentage than architects or building inspectors. As far as teaming inexperienced with experienced this becomes difficult to do on a response. We provide the individual to local government based on their requests. The local government deputizes the individuals and makes the assignments. In many respects they simply do not have time to try and team individuals by their experience. This is the primary reason that OES has agreed to re-write the training program and expand it. I am currently working on the program now and will be ready for review later this Spring. The course is planned as a 16-hour course which will be offered through our training institute (California Specialized Training Institute) located in San Luis Obispo. CSTI will take the course on the road to the various organizations who are sponsoring the course. All details have not yet been worked out, but the hope is to have the course certificated and provide continuing education credit.
- Prev by Subject: Re: Disaster dilemma
- Next by Subject: RE: Disaster dilemma
- Previous by thread: Re: Disaster dilemma
- Next by thread: RE: Disaster dilemma