Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: totally inappropriate... (Damn right)

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
love it!
Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Caldwell, Stan <scaldwell(--nospam--at)halff.com>
To: 'seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org' <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
Date: Wednesday, January 28, 1998 4:33 PM
Subject: RE: totally inappropriate... (Damn right)


>Have you seen the latest national poll?
>
>CNN asked 1500 randomly selected women if they would be willing to have
>sex with President Clinton.
>
>Apparently, 86% responded "Not Again".
>
>Stan Caldwell
>Still Politically Incorrect in Dallas
>
>>----------
>>From: John Cannon Jones[SMTP:jcjones(--nospam--at)pell.net]
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 1998 5:49 PM
>>To: 'seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org'
>>Subject: RE: totally inappropriate... (Damn right)
>>
>>
>>Several people have said that as long as Clinton gets the job done it's ok
by
>>them.  Right now there have been three affairs/indiscretions that probably
>>occurred.  What if that number were 10, 100, 500 ...  Where is the line
that
>>changes from his affairs being ok to not ok.  Is there a line as long as
the
>>American pocketbook is relatively full.  That seems to be what the public
is
>>saying.
>>
>>Whether someone is doing a good or bad job with something, wrong is still
>>wrong.
>>
>>John Jones
>>
>>
>>
>> Now, I am not comparing Mr. Clinton to Mr. Churchill, but only saying
that
>>it is what the man
>>accomplishes in office, not who he is doing out of the office, that counts
>>for me.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Wish;Dennis;S.
FN:Dennis S. Wish
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:wish(--nospam--at)cwia.com
REV:19980129T051107Z
END:VCARD