Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: New Subject Please[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: "'seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org'" <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
- Subject: RE: New Subject Please
- From: "Bill Allen, S.E." <BAllenSE(--nospam--at)pacbell.net>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 12:00:12 -0800
Bravo! Do we really need any more rules besides the 10 Commandments and the Bill of Rights? Regards, Bill Allen BAllenSE(--nospam--at)pacbell.net -----Original Message----- From: Brent Koch [SMTP:brentk(--nospam--at)tdl.com] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 1998 11:15 AM To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org Subject: RE: New Subject Please Let me apologize in advance for the following diatribe. Discussions which smell of censorship get me slightly riled. I believe threads on non-engineering topics can have a place on this list. The popularity of the recent Clintonesque thread and the time invested by numerous subscribers in its perpetuation validates its importance. And MORE IMPORTANTLY, no subscriber to the list is forced to read each end every posting. If you don't like the topic, don't read it. Pretty simple. I did/am not following the Presidential thread. In fact, there have been many topics on the list that I have chosen not to follow past the first few postings. A process one can use to not follow particular threads is very simple and can be performed with one's e-mail reader with minimal inconvenience. 1-First simply have your e-mail reader sort the mail by Subject. 2-Second, select the messages with the Subject(s) you don't wish to read about. 3-Delete. There already seem to be plenty of rules of participation for the list. I don't think restricting the content serves us well, particularly as we all have full control over what we do or do not read. Rather than working to control what others post to the list we should work on our own control of the means used to read it. If you have read this far through the message, Thankyou, and I now pass the soapbox on to the next freedom of speech advocate .... Brent Koch, P.E. Livermore, CA ------------------------------- lhoward(--nospam--at)silcom.com wrote: > > Okay, so maybe we should get a consensus on this issue. Is this list > an "Engineering only" list > or not? Several people have now indicated that they think this list > should be reserved for > engineering issues only. Several other people have opinioned that an > occasional off engineering > topic is okay. I don't think that anyone thinks that this list > should evolve into a free for all, > where engineering issues are the exception rather than the rule. > Maybe we need a list moderator that will put an end to off topic > issues if they start to get out > of hand (like this last one may have). > > Maybe more people should make their opinions known on this issue. I > don't mind the occasional off > topic issue, but if it bothers too many people on the list, then > maybe we should put a stop to it. > > Lynn -------------------------------- engrathm(--nospam--at)ix.netcom.com wrote: > > > To All Concerned: > > > > Please keep the topics to something related to Engineering. > > > > If you want to discuss Politicians find a chat room that specilizes. > > > > The only reason that I signed on to this list was to have other > Engineers to Listen to and to > > Talk with. Since I am a Private Consultant most of my time with the > engineers in my local area > > is spent on opposite sides of a clients problems. This does not > lead to an outstanding social > > interaction when we do meet in other places.
- Prev by Subject: RE: New Subject Please
- Next by Subject: RE: New Subject Please
- Previous by thread: RE: New Subject Please
- Next by thread: RE: New Subject Please