Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: duplication of plans

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Out of curiosity, how much of this $372,432,868 was due to damage of structures originally designed under the provisions of "Conventional Framing Provisions"? I know Frank Lew is out there some where thinking "where are the bodies" :o) ?

Regards,
Bill Allen
Richard_Ranous/OES(--nospam--at)oes.ca.gov wrote:

I second your concerns Dennis!  When SEAOC began working on the
conventional construction provisions, one of our biggest oponents was the
National Homebuilders Association.  Their standard comment was "we don't
see the level of damage that is being discussed."  Additionally, their
comments also included the unnecessary increase in cost reducing the
ability of people to afford housing.

This then adds to the concept that politically you can not require
strengthening or retrofit of single family residences.  The net result is
the Federal government paying $372,432,868 of taxpayer money to provide
temporary housing to 114,000 households after Northridge.

I wish I knew the right answer to address the problem once and for all.
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of California (SEAOC) email server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) to the list, send email to
*   admin(--nospam--at)seaoc.org and in the body of the message type
*   "join seaoc" (no quotes). To Unsubscribe, send email
*   to admin(--nospam--at)seaoc.org and in the body of the message
*   type "leave seaoc" (no quotes). For questions, send
*   email to seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org. Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be reposted
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
*   site at: http://www.seaoc.org