Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Re: Email Standards[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
- Subject: Re: Email Standards
- From: FLew98 <FLew98(--nospam--at)aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 13:21:48 EST
In a message dated 98-03-09 19:58:13 EST, nmends(--nospam--at)mt.net write: > After all, is there *no* point at which we should adopt a new > technology, just as we've all obviously adopted this one? That point is when the *vast majority* of participants, for whatever other reasons, have adopted, or have access to, a technology, software package or standard. The killer app that made the Net take off in recent years has been e-mail (much more so than the World Wide Wait), and garden-variety ascii e- mail capability is what is universally found on pc's. That is, and I believe should remain, the standard on this listserv until html e-mail capability becomes as ubiquitous among subscribers as the ascii format. This debate over formatting the work of virtual committees is putting the cart before the horse. We should focus on content first and foremost, not on format. Prettifying can be saved for final version of a product. A conversation I once had with a friend who was an english instructor at Berkeley has stayed with me. This was back in the late-seventies, when pc's were just starting to be used by well-heeled students. Most students at the time still turned in handwritten essays and compositions, but some students typed them, and a few actually turned in computer printouts written using Electric Pencil or some other early word processor. The printouts were always easier on the eyes, and typically contained fewer grammar and spelling errors. The friend said when she graded such papers, she made an effort to remain focused on the content, style,and development of the students' thoughts, and guarded against being subconsciously affected by the good looking printout. She called it the VEBS effect, and it remains valid today when substance is valued over form. What's VEBS? Well, the friend said if a paper is good, it's good regardless of the visual presentation, and if a paper is BS, then an impressive printout merely makes it Visually Enhanced BS. The nice thing about ascii e-mail is that, without possible VEBS effects, readers can more readily and objectively evaluate the message. In the rare instances when format is important, we can always resort to using attachments. Frank Lew, SE Orinda, CA
- Re: Email Standards
- From: Bill Allen, S.E.
- Re: Email Standards
- Prev by Subject: Re: Email Standards
- Next by Subject: RE: Email Standards
- Previous by thread: RE: Email Standards
- Next by thread: Re: Email Standards