Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Re: bridging to floor joists[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
- Subject: Re: bridging to floor joists
- From: BVeit <BVeit(--nospam--at)aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 13:29:50 EST
<<Are there any records of tests, or any information, on use of ceiling battens (e.g. 1.5in*1in battens at 2ft. spacing) as an alternative to solid bridging or herringbone strutting between solid timber floor joists? Bob Mahony>> I don't have a cross reference guide yet for the new code, so I can't say what '97 has to say about it, but '94 addresses it in sections 2306.7, 2304.3.6, and 2363. Note that the conventional framing provisions are more rigid on this topic, and require min. blocking member depths of two inches. I have heard a 2% rule for bracing -- two percent of the load on the beam laterally is adequate to be called "supported laterally". (This seems to make sense, but does anyone care to confirm/deny this?) I'd guess the battens are adequate. But 2363 says, paraphrased: when the compression edge is supported continually (as with a floor) and the ends are blocked to prevent rotation, the unbraced length is zero, and hence no bridging is req'd. In which case the battens are def. adequate. Brian Veit, P.E.
- Prev by Subject: bridging to floor joists
- Next by Subject: building classes
- Previous by thread: bridging to floor joists
- Next by thread: HUMOR: brief everything I know about Civil Engineering (fwd)