Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Wood - 2x wood ledger qu

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
You got me there - I guess we are back to a 4x ledger. A 3x is simply too
expensive to obtain.
Thanks again for your help, Roger.
Dennis

Dennis Wish PE
La Quinta, California
wish(--nospam--at)cwia.com
ICQ# 6110557
http://wwp.mirabilis.com/6110557

"Silence is the virtue of fools."
Francis Bacon

|-----Original Message-----
|From: Roger Turk [mailto:73527.1356(--nospam--at)compuserve.com]
|Sent: Thursday, April 02, 1998 7:26 AM
|To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
|Subject: Wood - 2x wood ledger qu
|
|
|Dennis,
|
|I don't mean to beat a dead horse, but I think that if Simpson had tested
|their connections with their 1-1/2" nails, that they would have specified
|"N10" nails in their tables, not 10d.
|
|Also, minimum embedment for full shear values is 12 diameters, which for a
|10d common is 1.78 inches, otherwise, the shear value has to be reduced.
|(1991 NDS 12.3.4)
|
|A. Roger Turk, P.E.(Structural)
|Tucson, Arizona
|
|
|