Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: Consideration of Column Cracking
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
- Subject: Re: Consideration of Column Cracking
- From: Mlcse <Mlcse(--nospam--at)aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 00:04:13 EDT
In a message dated 98-04-20 09:29:46 EDT, you write: << Subj: RE: Consideration of Column Cracking Date: 98-04-20 09:29:46 EDT From: kaa(--nospam--at)ce.tuiasi.ro (Cezar Aanicai) Reply-to: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org ('seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org') Abdi wrote: *************************************************************************** Reducing gross inertia of columns by 80% seems reasonable. You can also check the table 4.1 on page 163 of the following book for more accurate values of effective member moment of inertia: Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings By: T. Paulay and M.J.N. Priestley The Clause 10.14.1 of the Canadian standard CSA A23.3-94 and also the explanatory notes N21.2.2.1 and N21.2.2.2 of this standard suggests that flexural rigidity of the beams may be taken as 0.35 of their gross section value. Also there, it is suggested that the flexural rigidity of the columns may be taken as 0.70 of their gross section value. Abdi (A.S. Moghadam) sarvgha(--nospam--at)mcmaster.ca ******************************************************************** A more flexibile elements (columns and beams) will be "easy loaded". I don't agree this idea especially when we talk about the eigenvalues. To check other STATICAL conditions maybe it is right, but speaking by the point of view of dynamic analysis I can not be so sure that it is a good way to design the concrete structures. Cezar Aanicai kaa(--nospam--at)ce.tuiasi.ro >> Cracked sections should be used for the computer modeling of the concrete buildings. 1997 UBC 1630.1.2 requires the stiffness properties of reinforced concrete and masonry consider the effects of cracked sections. The effective moment of inertia (Ie) can be calculated from the curvature properties of the sections based upon the reinforcing steel layout, confinement reinforcing, cross section of the element, concrete strength, reinforcing strength and axial loads. See text books by "Park and Paulay" and "Paulay and Priestley" for curvature explanations. Calculation of the curvature of an element (beam or column) is very time consuming; moment frame beams can require separate calculations based upon top reinforcing in tension and bottom reinforcing in tension. Moment frame columns require consideration of maximum and minimal axial loads acting as well as calculation about both the y and x axis if the reinforcing pattern is not symmetrical. You end of with a envelope of effective moment of inertia values, which you then determine an appropriate weighted average value for each frame element of the building. Concrete by its very nature will crack during curing. During an earthquake we know that the concrete is also going to crack, this changes the stiffness, and therefore changes the period of the building. The problem is with the reduced building stiffness, you must still meet code drift requirements to control overall building P-delta effects. The effective moment of inertia for cracked walls may only be 10% -25% of the gross section moment of inertia. Highly loaded columns may have "I effectives" of 30% to 50% of gross properties and beams may also be in this range. As you can imagine, this makes building design a time consuming iterative process; select initial member sizes and stiffness, check drift, check stresses, check curvature of actual elements used and see if matches assumed stiffness, modify member properties as required (change geometry, reinforcing, concrete strength, etc.). The reason to use the cracked section for stiffness is to more reliably account for the actual expected performance of the building and control displacements which are underestimated when using gross section properties. It is almost easier to evaluate an existing building since all material and geometry of the frame elements/walls are known or can be determined. Then you determine the elastic lataral capacity of the building and then determine if strengthening is required. Michael Cochran
- Prev by Subject: RE: Consideration of Column Cracking
- Next by Subject: Construction As-built Drawings
- Previous by thread: RE: Consideration of Column Cracking
- Next by thread: Location of Prestressing plants
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]