Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Structural IBC

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
There is no "urgency" unless there are agencies who are considering/already
decided to skip the 1997 UBC (or 1999 BOCA?). Here in California, I believe
the Division of the State Architect has decided to stay with their 1995 CBC
(based on the 1994 UBC) until the IBC 2000 comes out. Other agencies may
decide to do the same thing and forego the double transition.

Regards,
Bill Allen

-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Turk <73527.1356(--nospam--at)compuserve.com>
To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
Date: Friday, April 24, 1998 9:23 AM
Subject: Structural IBC


>>BTW, check this week's ENR concerning the rush to adopt the IBC 2000.  I
>agree with Tyree's position --- that we are going too fast to accomplish
>something that doesn't require urgency!
>
>A. Roger Turk, P.E.(Structural)
>Tucson, Arizona