Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Dual List Servers

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
It's been a long time and frankly, I forgot the address. However, I'm sure
you are familiar with all of the Woodworking newsgroups on the Usenet. Let
me know if you are not and I will get you the list. BTW, no hobbies on
Hilti's time!
Seriously, you will need a newsreader like the one that comes with
Microsoft's Internet Explorer or Netscape. Another shareware newsreader is
Agent (available at most shareware locations such as or
Let me know if you need any other information.

-----Original Message-----
From: Silva John Francis (sj) [mailto:SILVA(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Monday, May 04, 1998 9:46 AM
To: 'seaoc(--nospam--at)'
Subject: RE: Dual List Servers

Dennis, can you give me the address for the woodworking list that you
subscribe(d) to?  Thanks.

-John Silva

> ----------
> From: 	Dennis S. Wish[SMTP:wish(--nospam--at)]
> Reply To: 	seaoc(--nospam--at)
> Sent: 	Freitag, 1. Mai 1998 20:09
> To: 	seaoc(--nospam--at)
> Subject: 	RE: Dual List Servers
> Not a bad idea, then all of my Undeliverable Mail receipts from Rick's
> company can appear on the list that I am not involved with:>0
> Seriously, this would create too much work for Shafat at this time since
> he
> is the only one at the moment maintaining the server, list and web site.
> Another reason not to do this is that at present we receive only about
> 15-25
> messages a day. This is not considered excessive (compared to a
> woodworking
> list I belonged to that yielded 100-200 messages per day).
> Finally, if you took Bill and I off this list - you guys would be crawling
> back in a week from boredom.
> Dennis
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick.Drake(--nospam--at) [mailto:Rick.Drake(--nospam--at)]
> Sent: Friday, May 01, 1998 3:25 AM
> To: seaoc(--nospam--at)
> Subject: Dual List Servers
>      We have had recent discussions on the SEAOC List Server about
>      separating technical and business discussions into two separate list
>      servers.  Part of the justification was that the volume on the
> present
>      list server was getting too large for one server.
>      Another approach would be to dedicate one list server for Bill Allen
>      and Dennis Wish to exchange their personal points of view and
> insults.
>      The second list server could then be used by the other 5,998 members.
>      This would essentially divide the list server load into two equal
>      halves.
>      Just a (tongue in cheek) thought.  ;-)
>      Rick Drake, SE
>      Fluor Daniel, Irvine