Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Question for East Coast Engineers

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
In simple terms, it means adding stuff to the code such that engineers would
be required to do more design work, thus gaining "full employment".

> ----------
> From: 	Dennis S. Wish[SMTP:wish(--nospam--at)cwia.com]
> Reply To: 	seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
> Sent: 	Thursday, May 07, 1998 4:14 PM
> To: 	seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
> Subject: 	RE: Question for East Coast Engineers
> 
> Duh!!!!!!
> I'm still lost here guy's. Will someone give me a simple explanation by
> Rick's comment: " These are the initial steps which need to be taken to
> raise the awareness of those who CAN change the provisions that there are
> serious problems and engineers are not looking for "engineers full
> employment" provisions in the
> code." What is the meaning of the phrase ""engineers full employment"
> provisions in thecode."
> Dennis
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Allen, S.E. [mailto:billallen(--nospam--at)earthlink.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 1998 2:34 PM
> To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
> Subject: RE: Question for East Coast Engineers
> 
> 
> I can only guess that the "Code Gods" are afraid that we will write
> provisions into the code that is self serving and whose primary goal is to
> protect and improve our income potential.
> 
> If we were capable of that, we would be attorneys, not engineers.
> 
> Regards,
> Bill Allen
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis S. Wish [mailto:wish(--nospam--at)cwia.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 1998 2:30 PM
> To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
> Subject: RE: Question for East Coast Engineers
> 
> 
> Would either Rick or Bill explain that the phrase "Engineers full
> employment" means in this issue. It went over me when Rick mentioned it
> and
> I'm not sure how it is to be interpreted?
> Dennis
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Allen, S.E. [mailto:billallen(--nospam--at)earthlink.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 1998 11:59 AM
> To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
> Subject: Re: Question for East Coast Engineers
> 
> 
> Heaven forbid private sector engineers getting "full employment". Instead,
> let's let every yahoo be able to stamp and sign structural drawings in
> high
> seismic risk areas. Yeah, that's a better idea. Don't want those engineers
> getting "full employment".
> 
> Regards,
> Bill Allen
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard_Ranous/OES(--nospam--at)oes.ca.gov <Richard_Ranous/OES(--nospam--at)oes.ca.gov>
> To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
> Date: Thursday, May 07, 1998 11:36 AM
> Subject: RE: Question for East Coast Engineers
> 
> 
> >These are the initial steps which need to be taken to raise the awareness
> >of those who CAN change the provisions that there are serious problems
> and
> >engineers are not looking for "engineers full employment" provisions in
> the
> >code.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>