Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: Architects Doing Engineering -Enough![Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
- Subject: RE: Architects Doing Engineering -Enough!
- From: "Dennis S. Wish" <wish(--nospam--at)cwia.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 12:52:43 -0700
Marlou raises some interesting issues. The first has to do with the responsibility of the plan check engineer. IMHO, the plan check engineers responsibility is not to check our numbers for math mistakes, but is to check the design for compliance to the code. This is especially true in times when computer programs spit out results without a tabulated math output to verify the arithmetic. Plan check engineers do not have the time to provide this type of tedious check, however, many have highly developed instincts for how materials work together and can identify an error that may be something simple like a math mistake. The issue about home quality is another one that I am passionate about. I disagree that the quality of any building should be comprimised simply because we have have a population of homeless that might be able to afford one of these structures if the cost of the structural engineering solutions were not so high. This is a rather convoluted concept originating with the idea of Conventional Framing. Don't misunderstand, I am not critizing Marlou - just the idea that the quality of construction needs to be comprimised to allow more families to afford homes. First, this is not an issue of homelessness since the homeless generally do not purchase homes. Multi-residential structures such as apartments are not part of the Conventional framing code. Second, consider this - many families who are low income or lower middle income live from paycheck to paycheck. Many are one paycheck away from foreclosure. The misconception is that the home is constructed under "low income" quality provisions or reduced code compliance which is not true. The home is generally constructed better than Conventional framing due to government subsidized programs and HUD standards. Only the family income is "low" and they are allowed to own based upon subsidized programs such as Self-help or similar programs. Still, as I said, many families are one paycheck away from bankruptsy or foreclosure. These are usually the families not considered "low income" but are "lower middle income". This class has enough money to go deeply into debt and who do not qualify for subsidized programs. My point is that they barely hang on to their homes as it is. Conventional Framing creates a structure that will not perform as well as an engineered product using the design methods which are non-prescriptive. Therefore, they may not be a life-threat, but will most likely suffer greater damage at the expense of the homeowner. Therefore, we should not be thinking that quality is a function of income. The developer of these homes (as with the example that Bill Allen presented) is the one who profits the most and at the expense of the buyer who is unaware of the performance of their purchase. If we are following prescriptive measures, they should not be less than those calculated for engineered products, they should simply contain all of the information needed to insure the same quality of construction. Dennis Wish PE -----Original Message----- From: MRodrig273 [mailto:MRodrig273(--nospam--at)aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 1998 11:08 PM To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org; Bill Allen,S.E. Subject: Re: Architects Doing Engineering -Enough! I agree with you. I am a student and I currently work for a place that allows me to do some engineering from time to time. I currently reviewed a set of calculations from an architect and I found a few static mistakes in his equations. I know I am just a student and I am just learning my self but I think the building departmenst should be a little bit more carefull in checking the work that goes through their office. The argument that I receive from other architects is that there are a lot of people suffering every day from being homeless so their job to design homes that are afordable is more important to them than making it seismicly stable. A concerned student Marlou Arce 98, Cal Poly, SLO
- Re: Architects Doing Engineering -Enough!
- From: MRodrig273
- Re: Architects Doing Engineering -Enough!
- Prev by Subject: RE: Architects Doing Engineering -Enough!
- Next by Subject: RE: Architects Doing Engineering -Enough!
- Previous by thread: Re: Architects Doing Engineering -Enough!
- Next by thread: Re: Architects Doing Engineering -Enough!