Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: Software Upgrades[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: "'seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org'" <seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org>
- Subject: RE: Software Upgrades
- From: "Caldwell, Stan" <scaldwell(--nospam--at)halff.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 09:32:38 -0500
Tom: Don't jump to any conclusions. I still use Netscape Communicator 4.05 for browsing, because it is still better than Internet Explorer 4.01. But Outlook 98 is now my email client. Windows 98 co-exists with Netscape just fine (sort of like Dennis & Bill). Stan Caldwell in Dallas Go Stars !!! -----Original Message----- From: Tom Chiu [mailto:Tomchiu(--nospam--at)worldnet.att.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 1998 6:19 PM To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org Subject: Re: Software Upgrades You guys work for Bill Gates or what? By the way, Netscape is free also. ;-) Dennis S. Wish wrote: > > Be careful Stan, you may just be launching the second longest thread on this > list when you admit you like Outlook 98 (and I assume Internet Explorer) > freely distributed by Microsoft. I happen to agree with you, although I > haven't upgraded past Outlook 98 and IE4.0. I tend to like most things in > life that are free. > > Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Caldwell, Stan [mailto:scaldwell(--nospam--at)halff.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 1998 1:26 PM > To: 'SEAoC Listserv' > Subject: Software Upgrades > > About a month ago, I upgraded to Outlook 98. This is the best > integrated email client, schedule, and task manager that I have ever > used. The filtering is great, and it handles all of the modern formats. > Best of all, it is a free upgrade from Microsoft (freeware, not a > demo). > > Last week, I upgraded to Windows 98 (Release Candidate #5). So far, so > good. Although this really amounts to little more than a maintenance > release of Windows 95, it has eliminated all of the glitches that I had > been living with. Also, everything is now faster (thanks to priority > defrag), slicker (lots of new options and utilities), and smaller > (thanks to FAT32). Installation was painless! > > I recommend both upgrades. > > Stan R. Caldwell, P.E. > Dallas, Texas >
- Prev by Subject: RE: Software Upgrades
- Next by Subject: Soil report seismic acceleration minimums??
- Previous by thread: RE: Software Upgrades
- Next by thread: Shear Wall Tests - Static vs. Dynamic