Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Re: ALGOR Software[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
- Subject: Re: ALGOR Software
- From: Walter Sheen <wsp(--nospam--at)dhl.com.pe>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 16:15:32 -0500
Chris : Thanks for your answer, feels good not being the only one having trouble to get data out. But I agree it's an excellent software. We've being using it for about a year and a half, and I think that for most common uses, it really helps a lot, we are working now in some aluminum structures and what we do is check stresses are in the right range, and that's it, everything in the superview module (A module that lets you see grapically the results, for those of you who doesn't know the software). We're fighting now with the Time History analisys, and our worst problem is that their manuals really don't help you, so you have to be guessing and spending a lot of time to get to know the program. They've improved though in combinig elements, now in Superdraw III (The module in which you draw the structure, something like Autocad, not as powerful though, but good enough) you can define beam, plate and brick elements, and the program helps you decode them separately and then makes automatically the combined model. Thanks for your comments, really helped me a lot. But since I don't feel alone anymore, I'm sending an e-mail to ALGOR so they start thinking about improvement of the result data management. As I know, they are now involved in the Event Simulation, which is giving you a very powerful nonlinear tool to simulate events. Best regards. Walter Sheen, CE Lima, Peru At 23:27 2/06/98 EDT, you wrote: >Walter, > >My company has been using ALGOR for several years now and has had positive >results with it, although in my personal experience I am not the biggest fan. >Being a younger engineer (about 4 yrs exp.) I haven't had a chance to use all >of its capabilities, but the basic drawback for me has been the difficulty in >getting the raw data and its user friendliness. > >To get results we've had to create complicated EXCEL Macro programs just to >extract the data if a format usable to us. I've found myself spending >excessive amounts of time organizing results even from a simple model. I've >liked other programs much better that integrate the pre-processing and post- >processing together in one module. For me this is a productivity issue which >I think ALGOR could improve on. > >Also it isn't too specified to the structural engineering. Its a very >powerful general FEM program with non-linear capabilities (its also used by >mechanical engineers), but you may find yourself searching around for a while >to get it to do the things you want. More so than with your typical >structural software. > >On the good side, its been a very stable, reliable program. We don't find >ourselves updating it every 6 months with the lastest bells and whistles. In >this respect its a workhorse, and once you use it for a while it grows on you. >It has many strong defenders in our firm. > >I hope these comments have helped you. > >Regards, >Chris Hall, P.E. >San Diego, CA > > >
- Prev by Subject: Re: FW: ALGOR Software
- Next by Subject: ALGOR, EAGLE, ETABS, STAAD etc.
- Previous by thread: Re: FW: ALGOR Software
- Next by thread: fema 267