Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Continuity ties

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Now we have it from the horse's mouth (instead of the other end).

Thanks Hugh,
Bill Allen

-----Original Message-----
From: HBAP(--nospam--at) [mailto:HBAP(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 1998 4:08 PM
To: seaoc(--nospam--at)
Subject: Re: Continuity ties

No, it does not make sense to go from "wall to wall", particularly when the
building is 200 ft long and, say, 40 ft wide. I don't know the wording of
Division 91, however, the '97 UBC rationally states that the continuity ties
be between "diaphragm chords". See 1633.2.9(4). This has been restated in
first draft of IBC2000 (1613. I argued the point successfully with
County. You must, of course, check subdiaphragm shears and chord forces. As
member of ACI-551 (tilt-up committee) I have an opportuhnity to watchdog
upcomoing code provisions relating to tilt-up.  Hope this helps.   Hugh
Brooks, S.E.
PS: Re: tilt-up software.  I may be a bit prejudiced toward Enercalc's
panel program, as some of you know, but I have found it to be quite accurate
and easy to use.