Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE:[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: "'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE:
- From: "Wood, Chris" <CWood(--nospam--at)pcidesign.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 07:49:17 -0500
I do realize that you contribute a lot to this list and therefore have more latitude than us "lurkers" as far as comments. I have only been on the internet and this list for a little over a month and hopefully will be able to contribute like yourself. I just don't want to be as crotchety:-) Chris Wood -----Original Message----- From: Bill Allen, S.E. [SMTP:Bill(--nospam--at)AllenDesigns.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 1998 6:06 PM To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org Subject: RE: Thank you for the complement. First of all, if those who were offended by a "non-structural" thread would have kept their personal beliefs personal, the thread would not have gotten out of hand. Second (and more importantly), is your comment "I am also about one more 50 <DEL> day from signing off." a threat? Who cares if you sign off? SEAOC does not make a dime from the fact that you subscribe to the listserv. More importantly, I searched the archives for "Wood, Chris" and couldn't find one single technical contribution you have made (either original or beginning with RE:), although it is entirely possible you have changed your e-mail address recently. If so, I apologize. Otherwise, consider the following a gift from me: 50*<DEL>. Adios Chris, Bill Allen -----Original Message----- From: Wood, Chris [mailto:CWood(--nospam--at)pcidesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 1998 3:14 PM To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org' Subject: I am so glad the likes of Bill Allen & Kate O'Brien et al are around so that the rest of us can know what to tolerate and how sensitive to be about our own personal matters of faith. Their level of tolerance is obviously more superior to the rest of us. This is either going to be a STRUCTURAL list or STRUCTURAL and anything else I feel like broadcasting list. If it is a STRUCTURAL list then tolerance and sensitivity aren't really going to be an issue. My 2 cents. I am also about one more 50 <DEL> day from signing off. Chris Wood "If it weren't for certain hyper-sensitive Christians (who seldom have made technical contributions anyway)" "Wouldn't it be nice if the Puritans would un-subscribe and the contributors remain?" Regards, Bill Allen
- Prev by Subject: RE:
- Next by Subject: [no subject]
- Previous by thread: Re: Wind Speeds for design wind pressures
- Next by thread: Re: AutoCAD R14 question - THANKS!