Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Re: SEAOSC v. SEAOC[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: SEAOSC v. SEAOC
- From: <SEAOSC(--nospam--at)aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 15:19:09 EDT
In a message dated 7/20/98 5:21:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time, roh(--nospam--at)eqe.com writes: << Please believe me that there is no real intent on anyone's part to remove SEAOSC from SEAOC, any more than there is an intent to remove either of the other member associations. >> Ron, I appreciate your balanced comments regarding the recent SEAOC Board meeting -- objectivity is definitely needed. I also was there as an Observer for SEAOSC and as much as SEAOSC WANTS to believe your statement that "there is no real intent on anyone's part to remove SEAOSC from SEAOC", SEAOSC finds this difficult because this is NOT really what transpired at the meeting. When the straw vote was taken and four hands were raised (Ed Nicholson and Ken Luttrell from SEAOCC and John Price and Don Libby from SEAOSD) in support of John Price's intention of beginning expulsion proceedings against SEAOSC if the SEAOSC Board did not ratify the Bylaws amendment within 2-3 weeks, then I'd say that it was pretty clear that this group does want to expel SEAOSC. Since we could hardly believe what we were hearing (especially inspite of agreeing to ALL the recommendations presented eariler), James Lai (President of SEAOSC and holder of SEAOSC delegate Rick Ranous' proxy) specifically asked John Price twice to clarify if this was indeed his intentions. Price said "yes" both times. I was glad to hear you say (as Price was railroading the straw vote through) that the straw vote was a premature action. Unfortunately though, because President Luttrell was emotionally caught-up in this issue, I don't believe he formally recognized you and so your statement was probably out of order. Don Gilbert SEAOSC Administrator
- RE: SEAOSC v. SEAOC
- From: Bill Allen, S.E.
- RE: SEAOSC v. SEAOC
- Prev by Subject: RE: SEAOSC v. SEAOC
- Next by Subject: Re: SEAOSC v. SEAOC
- Previous by thread: Re: SEAOSC v. SEAOC
- Next by thread: RE: SEAOSC v. SEAOC