Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: [Seismic Zone 4 vs Richter Magnitude Number]
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint-return(--nospam--at)seaint.org, seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: [Seismic Zone 4 vs Richter Magnitude Number]
- From: Kenneth Tarlow <kentarlow(--nospam--at)netscape.net>
- Date: 29 Jul 98 11:33:34 PDT
seaint-return(--nospam--at)seaint.org wrote: If I am not mistaken, neither Blue Book nor Uniform Building Code (among others) do not give a "translation" of vertical / horizontal design load requirements for (say) Seismic Zone 4 into "Richter-scale-magnitude number". I know that this information is not needed to perform required structural calculations ... but it would be nice to know where I am at. Your help would be appreciated .. Dear Karen, There is no correlation between seismic zones and Richter scales, and in fact seismologists use a different scale, moment magnitude, to describe a faults potential. To determine how a fault will effect a given area equations were developed to calculate the peak ground acceleration at a site or a region. These equations are called attenuation equations and there are many of them. They consider the specific soil types to 'translate' energy to acceleration. Different faults have different potentials. This is determined by the length of fault and by the measured slip rate of a fault. Large magnitude earthquakes are more rare than lower magnitude earthquakes. All earthquake magnitudes can be defined by their rate of occurrence or their 'return rate'. The code for example refers to the 475 (often called the 500 year event) year event. If you assume that building's life is roughly 50 years there is only a 10% chance of a greater earthquake in any 50 year span, often called a 10% chance of exeedance. In California, most regions are effected by more than one fault. The pga at any site for the 500 year event is determined by what they call probabilistic approach. This basically means they statistically analyze all the pga's of all the faults and since say .4g acceleration can occur on two faults for that site or that region, the return rate of that pga would be reduced. The effect is that for the 500 year event the pga's are higher. Please note that a building in Salt Lake City when compared to a Building In Los Angeles can have the same or higher seismic forces in its life. Just that the probability is that the building in Los Angeles will have the higher loading. This is my final point. We as Structural Engineers Design buildings. Over the last few years there appears to be a greater reliance on the numbers coming out of the calculator. Seismic zone 4 roughly (very roughly) refers to zones with a pga of .4g. Most buildings are designed to .183g. Since .4g would create stresses greater than the strength of the material, something else must be working to hold the buildings together. This the detailing, and inherent ductility of our construction techniques. This not taught in school. I am not an expert on this stuff, but if I can answer any questions you might have Email me at ktarlow(--nospam--at)earthlink.net Regards, Ken Tarlow ____________________________________________________________________ More than just email--Get your FREE Netscape WebMail account today at http://home.netscape.com/netcenter/mail
- Prev by Subject: Re: [Fwd: Welding Electrodes]
- Next by Subject: A325 anchor bolts
- Previous by thread: Re: basement uplift follies
- Next by thread: Design Engineer Position Open
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]