Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Computer Address Book (Microsoft Fax )

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Microsoft Fax came with my win98 notebook. I tried to use Microsoft Fax and
the worst part about it was that it would not access the address book for
outlook express which meant that I had to enter an all new address book just
for faxes. I called tech support and they concurred with me that I was not
loosing my mind. They did offer a work around but it was not good. Classic
Microsoft snafu. I was very impressed with how well office was integrated
with New Office Document, but this was very annoying for me. I called around
and found that most of my colleagues agreed that Microsoft Fax was a piece
of junk and that they preferred WinFax. In the mean time I am still faxing
the old fashioned way. Maybe I should considering changing over to
Outlook98.

Cheers!

Jeff Smith
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Allen, S.E. <bill(--nospam--at)allendesigns.com>
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Date: Thursday, September 17, 1998 6:02 AM
Subject: RE: Computer Address Book


>Thank God the program did it itself because these kinds of things are way
>over my head :o). I use Microsoft Fax which sends and receives faxes using
>MS Exchange. I am fairly certain you can set it up with any fax software
>especially since I believe Microsoft Fax is no longer supported (it doesn't
>ship with Win98) . Outlook uses the same file as Exchange (mailbox.pst or
>*.pst, depending on how you set it up). With regards to MS Word, you go to
>Tools, Options, Mail Format, Message Format and select MS Word. I do not
use
>MS Word as my e-mail editor because I was disappointed in that a lot of the
>formatting done using MS Word (like tables) is not kept in the message. I
>prefer HTML and, if I need a table, cut and paste from a Word doc. I have
>also done a mail merge using Word and Outlook and it works great (although
>this should be a simpler process). Outlook is really, really powerful and I
>admit to only scratching the surface with regards to its capabilities.
>
>Regards,
>Bill Allen
>