Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: waterstop2[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: "'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: waterstop2
- From: Harold Sprague <harold.sprague(--nospam--at)neenan.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 08:30:53 -0600
This is similar to a waterstop at the base of a wall resulting in a T intersection. Generally a starter wall is formed so that the waterstop is not bent. You could form up a starter wall that would project into the intersecting wall about 4 inches. The waterstop would be placed in the center of the starter wall. This would allow placement of the waterstop without bending it. It is similar to an inverted shear key. It is not advisable to bend a waterstop unless it is specifically designed to be bent. | | | | |___|___| _______| | |__________ _________________________ Harold Sprague The Neenan Company harold.sprague(--nospam--at)neenan.com <mailto:harold.sprague(--nospam--at)neenan.com> -----Original Message----- From: ¹UA￠¹u [mailto:cbpark(--nospam--at)ns.kopec.co.kr] Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 1998 7:44 PM To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org <mailto:seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org> Subject: waterstop2 There is a 2" seismic gap between two concrete structures. And 9" rubber waterstop(3-1/2" embeded in each concrete face) is provided vertically at this seismic gap. But the concrete cover is 2". So interference is occured at horizontal reinforcement(#11@12) not vertical reinforcement(#14@9"). Can I bent waterstop to avoid interference with horizontal rebars if we do not move or relocate the reinforcement in both direction ????????
- Prev by Subject: Re: waterstop2
- Next by Subject: RE: waterstop2
- Previous by thread: Re: waterstop2
- Next by thread: RE: waterstop2