Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Re: footings a beam or a slab?[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: footings a beam or a slab?
- From: Parkerres(--nospam--at)aol.com
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 11:03:41 EDT
In a message dated 98-09-30 18:13:32 EDT, you write: << I have a case where I have a footing that is 24 inches wide and 16 inches deep. I found that the footing only requred minimum steel reinforcement. In the longitudinal direction I used 3 #5 bars and in the transverse direction I used #4 @ 6". >> Marlou - Is the footing part of a slab on grade system or a raised floor system? Is there a stem wall on the footing? What is your allowable soil pressure? Typically, we don't provide any transverse steel in the bottom of our continuous footings other than the hooks from the verticals in the stem wall if a stem wall exists. Without a stem wall, typically we have no transverse steel at all (I assume you're discussing steel across the 24" distance of the footing). This is very standard in residential, Type V construction. Also, we do provide longitudinal steel in the top of the footing (not so standard). For a 24" wide footing such as yours, maybe 3 - #4 top and bottom. Much of this is justified by low (1000 - 2000 psf) bearing pressures which just can't develop much load in the footing. Since the footing is so small (assuming a bearing width of 8" centered on the footing, the cantilevered part of the footing is 8" long x 16" deep), the shear force is within a distance "d", the corbel force is nominal due to the low soil bearing, and the bending is trivial. Good luck. Bruce Resnick, SE Parker Resnick Str. Eng.
- Prev by Subject: Re: footings a beam or a slab?
- Next by Subject: For Jose Diaz
- Previous by thread: Re: footings a beam or a slab?
- Next by thread: 1998 SEAOC Convention