Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: Questions about Residential design and 1997 UBC[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: Questions about Residential design and 1997 UBC
- From: "Dennis S. Wish PE" <wish(--nospam--at)cwia.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1998 13:01:10 -0700
A lot of this discussion originated from the fact that the Canadian Wood Council is interested in this subject as is the American Forest and Paper Associations and American Plywood Assoication. The National Association of Home Builders Research Center has been much closer to these organizations that many of us know.
While the engineers on the west coast have been resistant to change, these organizations have taken the iniative to try and improve the quality of homes.
Unfortunately, historic politics and professional discontent has not allowed those interested in improving the situation do so. I think that times are changing and the pressure upon building officials by the Insurance industry will be important in bringing professionals and builders together.
I started this thread with a reference to the proposed new committee of NAHB Research called the Residential Engineers and Architects Council on Housing (REACH). The intention of this group is to bridge a historic gap and define each member as a united team. The goal is to promote education and create better guidelines for prescriptive methodology.
With the announcement of the FEMA grant, it would be my hope that the efforts of each of these groups can, in some way, be linked (possibly through a SEAint sponsered Listservice).
This is something I intend to work on in hopes that we can help mitigate damage while limiting the involvement of design professional.
I urge those interested to notify their professional associations of their interest and have them provide names, numbers and email addresses so that we can help unite any who are interested.
My opinions are not meant to complicate or in any way interfer with the work being done under the provisions of the grant. I would only hope that a forum for discussion can be established that will provide Cal-Tech and others involved of some of the practical issues we see in the field on a daily bases.
Possibly, some of the photographs that many of us have taken of known deficiencies can be of use to the project.
I believe it is important to use the tools at hand to maintain open communication between REACH, CASE, SEA, NSPE, ASCE, LGSEA, AIA and others with interest in this issue.
Dennis Wish PE
From: T [mailto:vicpeng(--nospam--at)vtcg.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 04, 1998 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: Questions about Residential design and 1997 UBC
- Prev by Subject: Re: Questions about Residential design and 1997 UBC
- Next by Subject: Re: Questions about Residential design and 1997 UBC
- Previous by thread: Re: Questions about Residential design and 1997 UBC
- Next by thread: Re: Questions about Residential design and 1997 UBC